Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-27 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2016-08-27 16:27, Nikolaos Milas wrote: What may be a problem here? you miss update of SPF plugin to a never version you may need to if version > around rules there so spf none only is used on versions that support it upstream bug here

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-27 Thread Sean Greenslade
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 05:27:18PM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Thank you Sean for all your help. > > I am focusing on amavisd-new / spamassassin for my efforts. > > I have started a thread in the amavisd-new users mailing list, since > bayesian filtering is off-topic here. > > However, before

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-27 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 25/8/2016 7:46 μμ, Sean Greenslade wrote: Make sure the SPF rules have weights set, then check the spam report for a message. If SPF is working, you should see at least one of the SPF rules trigger for every message. Thank you Sean for all your help. I am focusing on amavisd-new / spamassa

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-25 Thread Sean Greenslade
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 05:28:35PM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 23/8/2016 11:58 μμ, Sean Greenslade wrote: > > > Hope this is helpful, > > Thanks Sean for your time and eagerness to help. I appreciate it. > > I am planning to try your suggestions. > > I am using CentOS 6. Can you please le

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-25 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 23/8/2016 11:58 μμ, Sean Greenslade wrote: Hope this is helpful, Thanks Sean for your time and eagerness to help. I appreciate it. I am planning to try your suggestions. I am using CentOS 6. Can you please let me know about the perl package SPF-related bug you mentioned? I have install

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-23 Thread Sean Greenslade
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:27:39PM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 20/8/2016 7:56 μμ, Sean Greenslade wrote: > > > ... > > - Enable & configure per-user bayesan filtering > > - Increase allowed storage space for bayesan databases > > - Update a particular perl package to make SPF work (CentOS /

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-23 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 20/8/2016 7:56 μμ, Sean Greenslade wrote: ... - Enable & configure per-user bayesan filtering - Increase allowed storage space for bayesan databases - Update a particular perl package to make SPF work (CentOS / RHEL specific bug) ... - Re-weight a bunch of internal rules, in particular the

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-20 Thread Sean Greenslade
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:30:38PM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > > We are already using postscreen, many RBLs, the fqrdns.pcre, amavis, > spamassassin with scamp and we are filtering about 60-70% of total incoming > mail as spam, but there is still much more that should be filtered out. > > Any

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Nikolaos Milas: > Hello, > > Has anyone developed and/or maintains PCRE filtering for porn spam senders? > > (Something like > https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre) > > I guess many sender / client domains could be filtered-away if they > include keywords like "kiss",

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-20 Thread Christian Recktenwald
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:30:38PM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone developed and/or maintains PCRE filtering for porn spam senders? > > (Something like > https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre) > > I guess many sender / client domains could be filtered

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-19 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone developed and/or maintains PCRE filtering for porn spam senders? > > (Something like https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns. > pcre) > > I guess many sender / client domains could be filtered-away if

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-19 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2016-08-19 19:56, Nikolaos Milas wrote: [no porn seen] I understand your suggestion to query the fail2ban db directly from postfix but I need to research more on how to implement that. yes if that could be done, it save alot, but if not fail2ban could possible just call a wrapper that upd

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-19 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 19/8/2016 5:29 μμ, Benny Pedersen wrote: fail2ban ? Thank you, I am already using fail2ban directly with the following rules: /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/: failregex = reject: RCPT from (.*)\[\]: 554 reject: RCPT from (.*)\[\]: 450 reject: RCPT from (.*)\[

Re: Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-19 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2016-08-19 15:30, Nikolaos Milas wrote: Any additional suggestions? fail2ban ? (permenent blocking is easy, hint, fail2ban uses sqlite db, its pretty simple to query it from postfix sqlite map)

Porn spam killer PCRE

2016-08-19 Thread Nikolaos Milas
Hello, Has anyone developed and/or maintains PCRE filtering for porn spam senders? (Something like https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre) I guess many sender / client domains could be filtered-away if they include keywords like "kiss", "girl", "date", "adult", "cute",