Re: PCRE question

2014-11-13 Thread J.
Thanks. I guess I'll have to dig into the SA rules for that then. From: Viktor Dukhovni To: postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:17 AM Subject: Re: PCRE question On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:08:54AM -0800, J. wrote: > P

Re: PCRE question

2014-11-13 Thread Erwan David
Le 13/11/2014 19:08, J. a écrit : > Why does this text match the pcre? As I read it, there must be a line > break after the underscores to match, but it's matching. Does . match > linebreaks?: > > Text: > "For Testing Only: __ xxx > > From: My Name > To: any one " > >

Re: PCRE question

2014-11-13 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:08:54AM -0800, J. wrote: > PCRE rule: > /*[\s\n\r]*(.*) (.*)@test.com/ REJECT testing > Why does this text match the pcre? As I read it, there must be > a line break after the underscores to match, Actually, no, because the [\s\n\r]* matches an

PCRE question

2014-11-13 Thread J.
Why does this text match the pcre? As I read it, there must be a line break after the underscores to match, but it's matching. Does . match linebreaks?: Text: "For Testing Only: __ xxx From: My Name To: any one " PCRE rule: /*[\s\n\r]*(.*) (.*)@