Re: FW: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:14:31PM -, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > > It works in practice. A few Postfix TLS proxies have been terminating TLS > > connections, making access control decisions and forwarding unencrypted > > SMTP to a non-Postfix server for many years now. > > > > These systems o

RE: FW: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Jonathan Tripathy
It works in practice. A few Postfix TLS proxies have been terminating TLS connections, making access control decisions and forwarding unencrypted SMTP to a non-Postfix server for many years now. These systems only run "smtpd" as a proxy, and use various internal services, but otherwise there is no

Re: FW: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:00:14AM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Tripathy > wrote: > > > > BTW, the machines in the CDE will all have anti-virus and automatic updates > > enabled. > > > > So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "pro

Re: FW: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Jonathan Tripathy: > So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and > not a "store and forward relay" http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html Someone will still have to monitor the logfile, and deal with "postmaster notification" email depending on how the notify_classes

Re: FW: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Mark Goodge
On 18/03/2010 13:53, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and not a "store and forward relay" In SMTP terms, a proxy is effectively the same thing as a store-and-forward relay. But yes, Postfix will do this very well. For inbound mail, you ca

Re: FW: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Reinaldo de Carvalho
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > > BTW, the machines in the CDE will all have anti-virus and automatic updates > enabled. > > So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a "proxy" and not a > "store and forward relay" > > > In theory you can to use 'smtpd_proxy

FW: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Jonathan Tripathy
> Any ideas on how to set up an "SMTP Proxy Server" to attain PCI Compliance? > I literally need postfix to just pass through mail to our ISP's smtp server. > We would then set outlook to use this local smtp proxy server. I work for a hosting company, we find it's

Re: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Barney Desmond
On 18 March 2010 23:59, J. Roeleveld wrote: > Does this mean that the service-desk of companies are not compliant either? Hehe, in a way. Social engineering is thankfully(?) outside the scope of PCI-DSS compliance. > 1) Check in phonebook for number of VISA credit card service desk > 2) Call lis

Re: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Thursday 18 March 2010 13:26:43 Barney Desmond wrote: > On 18 March 2010 21:57, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > 3. We read the report, and find things like "server exposes its > hostname in the greeting banner", or "server appears to allow the use > of the VRFY command". Does this mean that the

Re: PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Barney Desmond
On 18 March 2010 21:57, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > Any ideas on how to set up an "SMTP Proxy Server" to attain PCI Compliance? > I literally need postfix to just pass through mail to our ISP's smtp server. > We would then set outlook to use this local smtp proxy serve

PCI Compliance

2010-03-18 Thread Jonathan Tripathy
Hi Folks, Any ideas on how to set up an "SMTP Proxy Server" to attain PCI Compliance? I literally need postfix to just pass through mail to our ISP's smtp server. We would then set outlook to use this local smtp proxy server. I'm not entirly sure if a "relay" ser

Re: SSLv2 and encryption for PCI compliance

2009-07-27 Thread Noel Jones
Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: Jake Vickers: Now I know I posted the other day about disabling SSLv2, but if I add That solution was for MANDATORY TLS encryption. If TLS is not mandatory, then disabling SSLv2 is pointless: you allow plaintex

Re: SSLv2 and encryption for PCI compliance

2009-07-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jake Vickers: > > Now I know I posted the other day about disabling SSLv2, but if I add > That solution was for MANDATORY TLS encryption. If TLS is not mandatory, > then disabling SSLv2 is pointless: you allow plaintext email. I don

Re: SSLv2 and encryption for PCI compliance

2009-07-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Jake Vickers: > Now I know I posted the other day about disabling SSLv2, but if I add That solution was for MANDATORY TLS encryption. If TLS is not mandatory, then disabling SSLv2 is pointless: you allow plaintext email. But if it gives someone warm fuzzies, you can use smtpd_tls_protocols inste

SSLv2 and encryption for PCI compliance

2009-07-27 Thread Jake Vickers
t if I add the "smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt" line to my config, I can no longer receive mail from outside sources (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.). So while it does disable SSLv2 connections, it does not allow outside email to come in. For anyone who has done PCI compliance in the past, am