On 3/5/2010 6:05 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Jones put forth on 3/4/2010 2:51 PM:
The idea is that this might increase rhsbl hit rates if the hostname is
more frequently available. On the other hand, spam-only domains seem to
usually have verifiable hostnames, so I'm not sure how much this wi
Noel Jones put forth on 3/4/2010 2:51 PM:
> This patch adds a "reject_rhsbl_reverse_client" function that uses the
> unverified client hostname for the RBL lookup.
Cool. Thanks Noel.
> The idea is that this might increase rhsbl hit rates if the hostname is
> more frequently available. On the ot
Noel Jones:
> This patch adds a "reject_rhsbl_reverse_client" function that
> uses the unverified client hostname for the RBL lookup.
>
> The idea is that this might increase rhsbl hit rates if the
> hostname is more frequently available. On the other hand,
> spam-only domains seem to usually
This patch adds a "reject_rhsbl_reverse_client" function that
uses the unverified client hostname for the RBL lookup.
The idea is that this might increase rhsbl hit rates if the
hostname is more frequently available. On the other hand,
spam-only domains seem to usually have verifiable hostnam
