Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:53 PM -0400 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:02 AM -0400 Wietse Venema > >> wrote: > >> > >> > This patch breaks "postfix start", i.e. the master terminates > >> > with an error. I

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:53 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:02 AM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: > This patch breaks "postfix start", i.e. the master terminates > with an error. I'll investigate this as electric power permits. It

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:02 AM -0400 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > > This patch breaks "postfix start", i.e. the master terminates > > with an error. I'll investigate this as electric power permits. It depends on main.cf configuration. Below is the corrected versio

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 9:02 AM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: This patch breaks "postfix start", i.e. the master terminates with an error. I'll investigate this as electric power permits. Hi Wietse, Just to note, I do not see this issue with Linux systems. The "master" process works

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-31 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > > --On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema > > wrote: > > > > > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > > >> When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: > > >> > > >> zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks > > >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.13

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> The patch definitely strips off the %eth0 bit. > >> > >> [root@zre-rhel6-64 postfix]# /opt/zimbra/postfix/sbin/postconf -d > >> mynetworks mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 > >> [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::]/64 > > > > Good. Maybe it is worthwhile to st

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 29, 2012 3:49 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: --On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: > Quanah Gibson-Mount: >> When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: >> >> zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks >> mynetwork

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > --On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema > wrote: > > > Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: > >> > >> zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks > >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 > >> [fc00:1

Re: PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema wrote: Quanah Gibson-Mount: When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::%eth0]/64 Try this. Build

PATCH: Question on postconf -d mynetworks

2012-10-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Quanah Gibson-Mount: > When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns: > > zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64 > [fe80::%eth0]/64 Try this. Build Postfix without installing it, then execute ``bin/postconf -d'