Andreas Schulze:
> Wietse Venema:
> > > To avoid [incompatibility] with Sendmail, Postfix would have to
> > > implement the same behavior as Sendmail: ignore the MTA's own
> > > received header when reporting headers to Milters, but don't ignore
> > > the MTA's own received header when receiving Mi
Wietse Venema:
> > To avoid [incompatibility] with Sendmail, Postfix would have to
> > implement the same behavior as Sendmail: ignore the MTA's own
> > received header when reporting headers to Milters, but don't ignore
> > the MTA's own received header when receiving Milter requests [...].
>
> I
A. Schulze:
>
> wietse:
>
> > I have patches for evaluation:
> > Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later:
> just compiling ...
>
> > Postfix 2.8, 2.9. 2.10, 2.11, and Postfix 2.12 released before 20140918:
> > ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-
wietse:
I have patches for evaluation:
Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later:
just compiling ...
Postfix 2.8, 2.9. 2.10, 2.11, and Postfix 2.12 released before 20140918:
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.11.pa
Wietse Venema:
> This week I fixed a problem or PREPEND actions in access maps or
> policy server reponses that was giving problems with DMARC setups
> that combine of SPF policy server with a DKIM Milter.
>
> Meanwhile, Christian R??ner has pointed out that there still is a
> different problem wi
