Manish Kathuria a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Pat wrote:
>> Manish Kathuria wrote:
>>> the mail administrator is more interested in having a look at
>>> the attachments being sent with the mail which would appear
>>> encoded in the queues. Is there any web interface to have a
>>> l
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Pat wrote:
> Manish Kathuria wrote:
>> the mail administrator is more interested in having a look at
>> the attachments being sent with the mail which would appear
>> encoded in the queues. Is there any web interface to have a
>> look at the messages in the queue
Hi,
I have started working on a new outgoing mail moderator daemon. It
controls the outgoing mail for seeing if it seems to be legal or not
just looking you're normal behave, and some other items and will
determine if mail is spammy or not (without looking at the content of
the mail... so
Manish Kathuria wrote:
> the mail administrator is more interested in having a look at
> the attachments being sent with the mail which would appear
> encoded in the queues. Is there any web interface to have a
> look at the messages in the queue and also issue the postsuper
> command ?
We use pos
* Manish Kathuria :
> Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the outgoing
> mails from all the users or selective users are held in a queue, and are
> released only after they are examined and approved by the administrator or a
> designated person ?
Another idea:
Use amavi
* Manish Kathuria :
> Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the outgoing
> mails from all the users or selective users are held in a queue, and are
> released only after they are examined and approved by the administrator or a
> designated person ?
Use a combination of HOL
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the
> > > outgoing mails from all the users or selective users are held i
On 10/10/2009 7:48 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
This particular organization has lot of sensitive information and data
which they don't want to be leaked. The bcc-maps are no doubt the best
alternative (and were my suggestion too) but they want to have a
proactive approach and prevent any kind of
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Manish Kathuria put forth on 10/10/2009 1:19 AM:
>
> > That's a great tip. This would serve the purpose as far as the text
> > messages go. However the mail administrator is more interested in having
> > a look at the attachments being sent w
Manish Kathuria put forth on 10/10/2009 1:19 AM:
> That's a great tip. This would serve the purpose as far as the text
> messages go. However the mail administrator is more interested in having
> a look at the attachments being sent with the mail which would appear
> encoded in the queues. Is ther
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Manish Kathuria wrote:
>
> > Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the
> > outgoing mails from all the users or selective users are held in a
> > queue, and are released only after they are exami
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the
> outgoing mails from all the users or selective users are held in a
> queue, and are released only after they are examined and approved by
> the administrator or a designated person ?
Is there any content filtering mechanism available using which the outgoing
mails from all the users or selective users are held in a queue, and are
released only after they are examined and approved by the administrator or a
designated person ?
--
Manish
13 matches
Mail list logo