Re: One more post-rebuild weirdness

2016-03-23 Thread Rick Zeman
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 3/22/2016 10:03 PM, Rick Zeman wrote: >> Oops, knew I forgot something, Noel. This is a (soft) bounce f >> recipient that does exist on the destination system, but not on the >> postfix system, as the following telnet shows: >> >> Mar 22 2

Re: One more post-rebuild weirdness

2016-03-22 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/22/2016 10:03 PM, Rick Zeman wrote: > Oops, knew I forgot something, Noel. This is a (soft) bounce for a > recipient that does exist on the destination system, but not on the > postfix system, as the following telnet shows: > > Mar 22 22:32:32 miniserv postfix/smtpd[70673]: NOQUEUE: reject:

Re: One more post-rebuild weirdness

2016-03-22 Thread Rick Zeman
Oops, knew I forgot something, Noel. This is a (soft) bounce for a recipient that does exist on the destination system, but not on the postfix system, as the following telnet shows: Mar 22 22:32:32 miniserv postfix/smtpd[70673]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from pmta1.delivery8.ore.mailhop.org[54.191.1

Re: One more post-rebuild weirdness

2016-03-22 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/22/2016 8:54 PM, Rick Zeman wrote: > OS X Postfix system rebuilt as a relay with no local mailboxes, but > we're not passing inbound mail to the final destination except for the > few people who have local accounts on the postfix server. Soft bounce > is onluckily (great safety net, Wiets

One more post-rebuild weirdness

2016-03-22 Thread Rick Zeman
OS X Postfix system rebuilt as a relay with no local mailboxes, but we're not passing inbound mail to the final destination except for the few people who have local accounts on the postfix server. Soft bounce is onluckily (great safety net, Wietse). I have something that's negating reject_un