On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST,
> Jerry wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
> > Victoriano Giralt articulated:
> >
> > > I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions for mail routing
> > > and is i
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST,
Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
> Victoriano Giralt articulated:
>
> > I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions for mail routing
> > and is in use in several Universities and Higher Ed institutions:
> > http://www.redir
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
Victoriano Giralt articulated:
> On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
> >> Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
> >> abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
> >> implemented via LDAP if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2010 01:24 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
>> http://wiki.rediris.es/gtschema/Portada
>
> I'm getting a "Mediawiki internal error" there, does it work for you?
Works for me right now (Wed Jul 7 13:29:29 CEST 2010)
- --
Victoriano Giralt
Systems Man
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:02, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
>>> Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
>>> abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
>>> implemented via LDAP if you so choose. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
>> Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
>> abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
>> implemented via LDAP if you so choose. The mapping betwe
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:22:47PM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote:
> >> - Allow multidomain
> >
> > I don't know what this means.
>
> Hi Viktor, thanks for your reply.
>
> This means "be able to hold several virtual domains as destination".
> Think of an ISP configuring a shared email platform for sev
On 07/06/2010 04:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote:
FWITW, I've used this as a reference in the past. After you build a few of
these systems, They become quite easy.
http://phamm.org/
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote:
>
>> Basically the schema should :
>>
>> - Be OpenLDAP compatible
>
> Not a problem.
>
>> - Allow multidomain
>
> I don't know what this means.
Hi Viktor, thanks for your reply.
Thi
This site uses LDAP for postfix/dovecot administration since about ten
years.
We use qmailControl.schema (to define the domains, which are accepted at
this site) and qmail.schema (to define the mailboxes whithin these
domains).
suomi
On 2010-07-06 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote:
> Basically the schema should :
>
> - Be OpenLDAP compatible
Not a problem.
> - Allow multidomain
I don't know what this means.
> - Host transports for each defined account / email address.
This is not a good idea. Avoid using LDAP
Hi all,
I'm planning now a LDAP-based Postfix setup and struggling designing
the how the LDAP schema should look like.
Basically the schema should :
- Be OpenLDAP compatible
- Allow multidomain
- Host transports for each defined account / email address.
- Integrate with dovecot and/or cyrus-imap
12 matches
Mail list logo
