Dudi Goldenberg put forth on 9/25/2010 6:57 AM:
> Debian lenny testing holds postfix 2.7.1, works without any issues for a long
> time here.
Just to clarify, Debian Lenny is the Stable distribution. Debian
Squeeze is the Testing distribution.
Or, at least, it was. The Squeeze code base has be
Jerry put forth on 9/25/2010 6:37 AM:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:30:40 -0500
> cajun articulated:
>
>> Only reason is it is a production machine and using Debian Lenny. Not
>> that I would have any question at all about whether Postfix was
>> stable at all.
>
> Sorry, I am not familiar with Debia
>Sorry, I am not familiar with Debian. I am assuming, and I might be
>wrong, that the Debian people are not too interested in keeping their
>stock offerings up-to-date. Too bad; I question what else they lag
>behind.
kitty:~# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 2.7.1
Debian lenny testing holds p
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:30:40 -0500
cajun articulated:
> Only reason is it is a production machine and using Debian Lenny. Not
> that I would have any question at all about whether Postfix was
> stable at all.
Sorry, I am not familiar with Debian. I am assuming, and I might be
wrong, that the De
On 09/24/2010 03:13 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:53:02 -0500
cajun articulated:
I'm migrating a working Ver 2.1.5 server to Ver 2.5.5 (on a new box).
Two questions:
1) I assume it would not be a good thing just to copy main.cf&
master.cf along with the associated .db files to the
On 09/24/2010 03:35 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-09-24 3:51 PM, cajun wrote:
On 09/24/2010 01:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
It's usually safe to copy them and let postfix upgrade them
Thanks Ralf! There's at least 10,000 things I don't know about Postfix.
This was certainly one of the
On 2010-09-24 3:51 PM, cajun wrote:
> On 09/24/2010 01:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> It's usually safe to copy them and let postfix upgrade them
> Thanks Ralf! There's at least 10,000 things I don't know about Postfix.
> This was certainly one of them.
Ralf didn't exactly say, so just wanted
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:53:02 -0500
cajun articulated:
>
> I'm migrating a working Ver 2.1.5 server to Ver 2.5.5 (on a new box).
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) I assume it would not be a good thing just to copy main.cf &
> master.cf along with the associated .db files to the new server as I
> can s
On 09/24/2010 01:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* cajun:
I'm migrating a working Ver 2.1.5 server to Ver 2.5.5 (on a new box).
Two questions:
1) I assume it would not be a good thing just to copy main.cf&
master.cf along with the associated .db files to the new server as I
can see lots has
> Two questions:
>
> 1) I assume it would not be a good thing just to copy main.cf & master.cf
> along with the associated .db files to the new server as I can see lots has
> changed. I'm assuming that a line-by-line walk-through and comparison of the
> old & new files is prudent copying over o
* cajun :
>
> I'm migrating a working Ver 2.1.5 server to Ver 2.5.5 (on a new box).
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) I assume it would not be a good thing just to copy main.cf &
> master.cf along with the associated .db files to the new server as I
> can see lots has changed. I'm assuming that a line-b
I'm migrating a working Ver 2.1.5 server to Ver 2.5.5 (on a new box).
Two questions:
1) I assume it would not be a good thing just to copy main.cf &
master.cf along with the associated .db files to the new server as I can
see lots has changed. I'm assuming that a line-by-line walk-through and
12 matches
Mail list logo
