Re: Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread Aaron Wolfe
sends out an email > every day letting the user release the mail. > > Hope that helps > > > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Kay > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 2:43 PM > To

RE: Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread Kaleb Hosie
ail every day letting the user release the mail. Hope that helps -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Kay Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 2:43 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Mail rejected on "Received

Re: Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:43:29PM +, Kay wrote: > I often see mail being rejected by recipient servers because > an IP in a Received From header is blacklisted somewhere. > > This strikes me as a rather bad practise, since it undermines > the whole idea of SMTP authentication. > > Here's an

Re: Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/18/2010 1:43 PM, Kay wrote: Hi guys, I often see mail being rejected by recipient servers because an IP in a Received From header is blacklisted somewhere. This strikes me as a rather bad practise, since it undermines the whole idea of SMTP authentication. Here's an example reject: 550 5

Mail rejected on "Received From"

2010-03-18 Thread Kay
Hi guys, I often see mail being rejected by recipient servers because an IP in a Received From header is blacklisted somewhere. This strikes me as a rather bad practise, since it undermines the whole idea of SMTP authentication. Here's an example reject: 550 5.7.1 This system has been conf