On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:30:05PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> I try to understand different mail delivery times.
Sure, that's a quantitative analysis, and doing requires looking in
detail at the delivery latencies in the logs of both client and server.
To get help with this, you'll need to pos
On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:59:05 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
Did you test by changing the value of $mynetworks and using the same
source machine or are the SASL and $mynetworks sources physically
different machines?
No, of course it was the same machine. I’m very sorry, I thought that
would be obv
On 1 Sep 2020, at 8:30, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Hello!
I try to understand different mail delivery times.
I have a script (phpmailer) that sends 500 mails to a remote mail
server. The target address is a local /dev/null mailbox. The script
uses SMTPKeepAlive = true; to keep the connection open
Stephan Seitz:
> On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:27:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >Stephan Seitz:
> >> If my client IP is part of mynetworks the time for 500 mails is about
> >> 29 seconds.
> >That's 5.8ms per delivery.
> >
> >> If [not in mynetworks] the time is about 47 seconds.
> >That's 9.4ms per
On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:46:26 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
Do you control the target server? If not, then you have no idea what
Yes, I do control the server. This is a simple setup, no spamfilter or
such things. And yes, besides the fact that in one case the sasl user is
logged there aren’t any ot
On 01 Sep 2020, at 07:37, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:18:44 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>> It could be as simple as the remote severing taking very slightly longer to
>> process for reasons on its end (slower lookup into its tables from the
>> secure ports, for example).
>
> I us
On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:18:44 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
It could be as simple as the remote severing taking very slightly longer
to process for reasons on its end (slower lookup into its tables from
the secure ports, for example).
I used port 25 for both tests, so that I could hope to avoid diff
On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:27:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephan Seitz:
If my client IP is part of mynetworks the time for 500 mails is about
29 seconds.
That's 5.8ms per delivery.
If [not in mynetworks] the time is about 47 seconds.
That's 9.4ms per delivery. Looks like your network roun
Stephan Seitz:
> Hello!
>
> I try to understand different mail delivery times.
>
> I have a script (phpmailer) that sends 500 mails to a remote mail server.
> The target address is a local /dev/null mailbox. The script uses
> SMTPKeepAlive = true; to keep the connection open.
>
> If my client
On 01 Sep 2020, at 06:30, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> So I’m wondering why I have such a big time difference.
You would have to look deeper at the logs and see where the delay is being
introduced. This might be hard as it is 3/10th of a second per message.
It could be as simple as the remote severin
Hello!
I try to understand different mail delivery times.
I have a script (phpmailer) that sends 500 mails to a remote mail server.
The target address is a local /dev/null mailbox. The script uses
SMTPKeepAlive = true; to keep the connection open.
If my client IP is part of mynetworks the t
11 matches
Mail list logo
