Re: Lookup Performance for Postmapped Files

2008-12-10 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:52:29AM -0800, Fat Bear Mail Services wrote: > My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many thousands > of lines. This is tiny. > Does sorting the virtual file before running postmap improve > subsequent lookup performance? Just curious. No. Perfo

Re: Lookup Performance for Postmapped Files

2008-12-10 Thread Terry Carmen
Fat Bear Mail Services wrote: My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many thousands of lines. Does sorting the virtual file before running postmap improve subsequent lookup performance? Just curious. It' a hash table, so the sort order for the inserted data is irrelevant

Re: Lookup Performance for Postmapped Files

2008-12-10 Thread Heiko Wundram
Am Wednesday 10 December 2008 15:52:29 schrieb Fat Bear Mail Services: > My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many thousands > of lines. Does sorting the virtual file before running postmap improve > subsequent lookup performance? Just curious. Short answer: no. Long answer

Re: Lookup Performance for Postmapped Files

2008-12-10 Thread Alessandro Ballestriero
Fat Bear Mail Services ha scritto: My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many thousands of lines. Does sorting the virtual file before running postmap improve subsequent lookup performance? Just curious. Thanks, Steve Amerige Fat Bear Hi, use CDB format is most optimize

Lookup Performance for Postmapped Files

2008-12-10 Thread Fat Bear Mail Services
My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many thousands of lines. Does sorting the virtual file before running postmap improve subsequent lookup performance? Just curious. Thanks, Steve Amerige Fat Bear