RE: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-29 Thread Aaron Bennett
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Michael Maymann Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:01 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: LoadShared Failover Hi List, Only problem I see now is when one of the postfix servers dies. Clients

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Maymann: > ; zone file fragment > IN MX 10 mail.example.com > . > > mailIN A 10.10.10.100 > IN A 10.10.20.100 > > 3. Clients will use mail.example.com as server. > > Only problem I see now is when one of the postfix servers dies. Clients > will st

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-29 Thread Michael Maymann
Hi List, I have now looked all over the web to try and find best possible solution for me... (redundant loadshared sending-only mailgw)... this is currently what I think of doing...: 1. Setup 2 postfix servers in 2 physical different location with same configuration (handles by our HostConfigurati

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-12 Thread Wietse Venema
There is one correction, in-line. > Kris Deugau: > > We found that DNS-based round-robin strategies didn't actually balance > > the load very well. > > This looks like the same problem that was found (and solved) with > Postfix outbound connection caching; if a destination host became > slow for

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-12 Thread Wietse Venema
Kris Deugau: > We found that DNS-based round-robin strategies didn't actually balance > the load very well. This looks like the same problem that was found (and solved) with Postfix outbound connection caching; if a destination host became slow for whatever reason, it became a fatal attractor for

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-12 Thread Kris Deugau
Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 3/12/2012 2:28 AM, Michael Maymann wrote: Hi, Stan: My question is not how I setup the solution, but how I *BEST* (best practice) setup the loadshared/failover postfix solution I described earlier. I dunno if there is a BCP covering smtp submission/relay server load

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-12 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 3/12/2012 2:28 AM, Michael Maymann wrote: > Hi, > > Stan: My question is not how I setup the solution, but how I *BEST* (best > practice) setup the loadshared/failover postfix solution I described > earlier. I dunno if there is a BCP covering smtp submission/relay server load

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-12 Thread Michael Maymann
Hi, Stan: My question is not how I setup the solution, but how I *BEST* (best practice) setup the loadshared/failover postfix solution I described earlier. If there isn't a nice howto already, I guess I can figure this out myself - bonding is easy, if this is the prefered solution for a po

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-11 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 3/10/2012 8:30 AM, Michael Maymann wrote: > How do I best setup a loadshared failover postfix mailrelay solution for > this on RHEL6 ? You consult the RHEL6 documentation. If you don't find the answer there, you contact Red Hat support who will point you in the right direction.

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-10 Thread Michael Maymann
Hi, Wietse: always nice with a bit of humor... :) ! I guess I then only need A records, as this will be our only mailserver inhouse for R&D. Benny: I guess this is not needed then, but just out of curiosity: for a internal sending-only mailrelay why can't I use RFC1918 IPs ? 1. Is best practice t

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
Den 2012-03-10 09:47, Michael Maymann skrev: ; zone file fragment IN MX 10 mail.example.com. mail IN A 192.168.0.4 IN A 192.168.0.5 IN A 192.168.0.6 dont list rfc1918 ip in mx, but if its just a question on model, go for this solution

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Maymann: > How do I best setup a loadshared failover postfix mailrelay solution for > this on RHEL6 ? To repeat my previous response: - MX records are useful only for MTAs. - If you have end-user clients, use A records. Perhaps surprisingly, that response still stands. Th

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-10 Thread Michael Maymann
mailserver We're not receiving any external mails...! How do I best setup a loadshared failover postfix mailrelay solution for this on RHEL6 ? thanks in advance :-) ! ~maymann 2012/3/10 Wietse Venema > Michael Maymann: > > If RoundRobin is best practise/preferred solution, should I

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Maymann: > If RoundRobin is best practise/preferred solution, should I then do: > > ; zone file fragment > IN MX 10 mail.example.com. > > mailIN A 192.168.0.4 > IN A 192.168.0.5 > IN A 192.168.0.6 > > or > > ; zone file fragment >

Re: LoadShared Failover

2012-03-10 Thread Michael Maymann
interfere with our corporate mail on the same domain - is there anything DHCP/DNS MX-to-clients update-wise I should be aware of ? Thanks in advance :) ! ~maymann 2012/3/10 Michael Maymann > Hi List, > > I would like to setup a LoadShared Failover internal mail-relay solution >

LoadShared Failover

2012-03-09 Thread Michael Maymann
Hi List, I would like to setup a LoadShared Failover internal mail-relay solution (only for sending mail internal->external). My thoughts: - Setup virtual+physical server in same VLAN (different physical locations) with same OS+Postfix+config - Configure DNS RoundRobin - Have logging from b