On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:35:46 +0100
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> I am working on an updated version as time permits.
Thank you, Patrick. Looking forward to the newer version when it's out
there.
-Dennis
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:10:11 +
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> The basic concepts (what you need to understand) have not changed
> much, in that sense the old books are fine. The specific facts you
> need to know to tweak Postfix to do non-routine tasks may have
> changed a bit, but the documentatio
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:50:48 -0700
Glenn English wrote:
> Have you considered printing (parts of) the website?
I hadn't, but being a broke college student, it may cost a bit. I
could probably pull off printing it on campus though
-Dennis
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:08:26 -0600
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Dennis, how many computer books, or books in general, do you own? Do
> you have any on display? Or are they all simply hoarded away in boxes
> in the attic or basement?
Two shelves of books I could use regularly on things various such a
Stan Hoeppner:
> On 11/24/2012 12:44 PM, Dennis Carr wrote:
>
> > I miss my dead tree versions being current. =/
>
> An old friend of mine used to have 3 large book cases of computer books.
> One was filled with the full book set of a couple Caldera releases, a
> few Red Hat releases, and every
On 11/24/2012 12:44 PM, Dennis Carr wrote:
> I miss my dead tree versions being current. =/
An old friend of mine used to have 3 large book cases of computer books.
One was filled with the full book set of a couple Caldera releases, a
few Red Hat releases, and every SuSE release he had purchased
* Viktor Dukhovni :
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:44:10AM -0800, Dennis Carr wrote:
>
> > So I went and looked at O'Reilly Publications, as they had, for me,
> > been the historical go-to for tech documentation of all flavors.
> > Imagine my dismay, then, when I find that the cricket book (DNS and
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:44:10AM -0800, Dennis Carr wrote:
> So I went and looked at O'Reilly Publications, as they had, for me,
> been the historical go-to for tech documentation of all flavors.
> Imagine my dismay, then, when I find that the cricket book (DNS and
> BIND) was current for versio
On Nov 24, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Dennis Carr wrote:
> Checking bookfinder, though, it appears that much of what's out there seems
> to only be as recent as 2004. =/
My "Book of Postfix" (No Starch Press) is a year newer than that -- well done,
but still significantly out of date.
Have you consi
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dennis Carr:
and having said all this, I realize I forgot the query, but it may be
foregone. =) Does anyone know who's currently published the most recent
documentation for Postfix in a dead-tree form?
Have you tried a bookseller's search en
Dennis Carr:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Dennis Carr wrote:
>
> > I miss my dead tree versions being current. =/
>
> and having said all this, I realize I forgot the query, but it may be
> foregone. =) Does anyone know who's currently published the most recent
> documentation for Postfix in a d
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Dennis Carr wrote:
I miss my dead tree versions being current. =/
and having said all this, I realize I forgot the query, but it may be
foregone. =) Does anyone know who's currently published the most recent
documentation for Postfix in a dead-tree form?
-Dennis
So I went and looked at O'Reilly Publications, as they had, for me, been
the historical go-to for tech documentation of all flavors. Imagine my
dismay, then, when I find that the cricket book (DNS and BIND) was current
for version 9.3, but more to the point for this list's topic, Postfix has
n
13 matches
Mail list logo
