Re: LMTP delivery failover [SRV support]

2014-01-28 Thread Andrzej A. Filip
On 01/28/2014 03:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:21:01AM +0100, Andrzej A. Filip wrote: > Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective? >>> >>> What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite >>> and must be spent wisely. >> >> IM

Re: LMTP delivery failover [SRV support]

2014-01-28 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:21:01AM +0100, Andrzej A. Filip wrote: > >> Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective? > > > > What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite > > and must be spent wisely. > > IMHO it would allow better configuration of (internet

Re: LMTP delivery failover [SRV support]

2014-01-27 Thread Andrzej A. Filip
On 01/28/2014 12:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Andrzej A. Filip: >> Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective? > > What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite > and must be spent wisely. IMHO it would allow better configuration of (internet to internal)

Re: LMTP delivery failover [SRV support]

2014-01-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Andrzej A. Filip: > Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective? What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite and must be spent wisely. Wietse

Re: LMTP delivery failover [SRV support]

2014-01-27 Thread Andrzej A. Filip
On 01/27/2014 09:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Quanah Gibson-Mount: >> As part of making Zimbra more robust, we're abstracting our data layer. >> Currently, LMTP delivery is configured to point at a specific mailstore, >> which accepts delivery and stores the email in a SQL database. As part of