Re: LMTP bounce handling problem

2009-04-07 Thread Wietse Venema
Victor Duchovni: > So it looks like the "inet:" default went away when LMTP was merged with > SMTP in 2.3. The code attempts to be backwards compatible: /* * With LMTP we have direct-to-host delivery only. The destination may * have multiple IP addresses. */ if (state->misc

Re: LMTP bounce handling problem

2009-04-07 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:17:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:56:52PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > while trying to upgrade from Postfix 2.1.5 to a newer version, i > > experience problems with LMTP bounce handling. > > Please define problems. Why should a per

Re: LMTP bounce handling problem

2009-04-07 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:56:52PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > while trying to upgrade from Postfix 2.1.5 to a newer version, i > experience problems with LMTP bounce handling. Please define problems. Why should a permanent error not cause a bounce as mandated by the RFC? > Config paramete

LMTP bounce handling problem

2009-04-07 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, while trying to upgrade from Postfix 2.1.5 to a newer version, i experience problems with LMTP bounce handling. old postfix version: postfix/lmtp[13549]: E379B1C07E: to=, relay=lmtp.mx-domain.tld[XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX], delay=6, status=deferred (Authentication failed: SASL authentication failed; s