Re: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-09 Thread Wietse Venema
Brad Riemann: > Hi Ram, > > We are using ZXTM (also known as Stingray), with the built in SMTP > options from the load balancer (which really isn't much..), > everything im seeing in the config indicates it should be running > and processing on the application layer, were there any settings > on t

Re: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-09 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:04:13PM +0530, Ram wrote: > This seems to be a Firewall NAT issue. The Load balancer would add a HOP if > it is on the application layer. That's wrong. Layer 4 devices don't add SMTP hops (Received: headers, ...). -- Viktor.

RE: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-09 Thread Brad Riemann
djust to indicate it was smtp traffic or was it just tcp by default? Brad Riemann Techpro, Inc From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Ram Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 7:34 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Issues using Postfix beh

Re: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-09 Thread Ram
On 01/07/2015 10:40 PM, Brad Riemann wrote: Hello! First time caller, long time listener J. I’ve been working on a new mail filtering solution for our company that revolves around the solution receiving inbound mail through a load balancer. We have come upon an issue that I am not finding

Re: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Brad Riemann: > Thanks Viktor, I think I did figure out how to do this, but am > getting odd pipelining errors when we add the xclient and new > ehlo/helo headers. > > Jan 8 08:14:00 mta01 postfix/smtpd[16360]: connect from > edge.dc1.domain.com[172.16.###.###] > Jan 8 08:14:00 mta01 postfix/smt

RE: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-08 Thread Brad Riemann
: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:31:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Brad Riemann: > > The issue, if you don't see it, is that postfix seems to be using > > the load balancer ip as the last hop, and bec

Re: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-07 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:31:45PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Brad Riemann: > > The issue, if you don't see it, is that postfix seems to be using > > the load balancer ip as the last hop, and because the load balancer > > is just pushing content through it is not recording the previous > > hop

RE: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-07 Thread Brad Riemann
PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer Brad Riemann: > The issue, if you don't see it, is that postfix seems to be using the > load balancer ip as the last hop, and because the load balancer is > just pushing content through it is not recordi

Re: Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-07 Thread Wietse Venema
Brad Riemann: > The issue, if you don't see it, is that postfix seems to be using > the load balancer ip as the last hop, and because the load balancer > is just pushing content through it is not recording the previous > hop to the headers, which is causing some issues.. Postfix can get the client

Issues using Postfix behind a load balancer

2015-01-07 Thread Brad Riemann
Hello! First time caller, long time listener :). I've been working on a new mail filtering solution for our company that revolves around the solution receiving inbound mail through a load balancer. We have come upon an issue that I am not finding any sort of documentation or notes that others