Re: Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2022-05-01 Thread Pau Amma
On 2022-05-01 18:14, Wietse Venema wrote: Pau Amma: Still, there is room for making the link text shorter than I suggested while still providing enough context. For example, "tips how to port Postfix IPv6 support" or "how to port Postfix IPv6 support" may be enough context. I don't know the au

Re: Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2022-05-01 Thread Wietse Venema
Pau Amma: > >> Revised patch per above. While in proto/IPV6_README.html, I tweaked > >> the > >> link text in one spot for better screenreader accessibility per > >> https://webaim.org/techniques/hypertext/#alpha_links. (Other links > >> there > >> or elsewhere in the documentation may need simil

Re: Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2022-05-01 Thread Pau Amma
On 2022-05-01 00:09, Wietse Venema wrote: Pau Amma: On 2022-04-30 05:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 12:49:30AM +, Pau Amma wrote: > >> I finally got around to this, or rather to the half that didn't have a >> mention of NO_IPV6. While there, I noticed a stray uppercase

Re: Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2022-04-30 Thread Wietse Venema
Pau Amma: > On 2022-04-30 05:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 12:49:30AM +, Pau Amma wrote: > > > >> I finally got around to this, or rather to the half that didn't have a > >> mention of NO_IPV6. While there, I noticed a stray uppercase letter > >> elsewhere (2x) and fix

Re: Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2022-04-30 Thread Pau Amma
On 2022-04-30 05:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 12:49:30AM +, Pau Amma wrote: I finally got around to this, or rather to the half that didn't have a mention of NO_IPV6. While there, I noticed a stray uppercase letter elsewhere (2x) and fixed that as well. Patch (generate

Re: Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2022-04-29 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 12:49:30AM +, Pau Amma wrote: > I finally got around to this, or rather to the half that didn't have a > mention of NO_IPV6. While there, I noticed a stray uppercase letter > elsewhere (2x) and fixed that as well. Patch (generated from > postfix-3.8-20220421) attache

Re: Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2022-04-29 Thread Pau Amma
On 2021-01-21 05:03, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 04:37:19AM +, Pau Amma wrote: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#inet_protocols says: inet_protocols = all (DEFAULT) http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html says: inet_protocols = ipv4 (DEFAULT: enable IPv4 only) The

Re: Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2021-01-20 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 04:37:19AM +, Pau Amma wrote: > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#inet_protocols says: > inet_protocols = all (DEFAULT) > http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html says: inet_protocols = ipv4 > (DEFAULT: enable IPv4 only) > > The inconsistency should be fix

Inconsistency between postconf(5) and IPV6_README

2021-01-20 Thread Pau Amma
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#inet_protocols says: inet_protocols = all (DEFAULT) http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html says: inet_protocols = ipv4 (DEFAULT: enable IPv4 only) The inconsistency should be fixed.