we are turks and we hate sex word :P
thank you all.
selcuk.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Larry Stone wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:14 AM, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a rule on header checks file like this;
> >
> > /^Subject:.*sex/ REJECT "Bad Header 92"
>
On Mar 12, 2012, at 3:14 AM, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a rule on header checks file like this;
>
> /^Subject:.*sex/ REJECT "Bad Header 92"
>
> but last week our staff sen an email an it's subject is
>
> Subject: =?utf-8?B?QsSwWSBNRVNMRUsgRVTEsMSexLAgSEFGVEEgNQ==
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2012 09:26 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Improve the header checks e.g. by requiring a word boundary-
Although I agree, as encoded headers are becoming common place
nowadays, decoding would be a nice enhancement to the header checking
code.
Q
* Selcuk Yazar :
> Hi,
>
> We have a rule on header checks file like this;
>
> /^Subject:.*sex/ REJECT "Bad Header 92"
>
> but last week our staff sen an email an it's subject is
>
> Subject: =?utf-8?B?QsSwWSBNRVNMRUsgRVTEsMSexLAgSEFGVEEgNQ==
>
> thats why this mail rejected ? be
