Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Stefano Sasso
2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : >> The question now is... it's ok to use smtp_destination_recipient_limit >> = 1 within the first smtpd instance? > > smtp_destination_recipient_limit is a feature of the queue manager, > not of the SMTP server, so it has no effect in the SMTP server. yes, sorry, my mista

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefano Sasso: > 2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : > >> With content filters I have to use 2 smtpd instances + content filter > >> itself. > >> With this workaround only 2 smtpd instances. > >> Or am I totally wrong? > > > > You're describing a null filter configuration. It provides half of > > the quaran

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Stefano Sasso
2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : >> With content filters I have to use 2 smtpd instances + content filter itself. >> With this workaround only 2 smtpd instances. >> Or am I totally wrong? > > You're describing a null filter configuration. It provides half of > the quarantine management solution, namely, t

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefano Sasso: > 2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : > >> It's not a quarantine for spam/virus... :( > >> And I don't want to deploy amavisd only for this feature. > > > > You want quarantine management for non-spam/virus. It is available > > via a standard interface (in this case, content filters). ?There >

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Stefano Sasso
2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : >> It's not a quarantine for spam/virus... :( >> And I don't want to deploy amavisd only for this feature. > > You want quarantine management for non-spam/virus. It is available > via a standard interface (in this case, content filters).  There > is no priority to duplicat

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefano Sasso: > 2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : > >> Ok, I'll try to describe the problem :) > >> We need to "freeze" certain e-mail messages, with a set of rules based > >> on from and to. > > > > Quarantine management is a standard spam/virus filter feature. > > Look for amavisd, spamassassin, etc. Po

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Stefano Sasso
2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : >> Ok, I'll try to describe the problem :) >> We need to "freeze" certain e-mail messages, with a set of rules based >> on from and to. > > Quarantine management is a standard spam/virus filter feature. > Look for amavisd, spamassassin, etc. Postfix is just an MTA. It's n

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefano Sasso: > 2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : > > Stefano Sasso: > >> I need to put mail on HOLD based on a single RCPT. > > > > Please describe the PROBLEM instead of the solution (using HOLD). > > There may be other solutions than the one you chose. > > Ok, I'll try to describe the problem :) > We

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Stefano Sasso
2011/7/14 Wietse Venema : > Stefano Sasso: >> I need to put mail on HOLD based on a single RCPT. > > Please describe the PROBLEM instead of the solution (using HOLD). > There may be other solutions than the one you chose. Ok, I'll try to describe the problem :) We need to "freeze" certain e-mail m

Re: HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefano Sasso: > I need to put mail on HOLD based on a single RCPT. Please describe the PROBLEM instead of the solution (using HOLD). There may be other solutions than the one you chose. Wietse

HOLD single recipient

2011-07-14 Thread Stefano Sasso
Hello list, Is there a way to have multiple queue files for a mail message, one for each recipient? In a normal configuration, if I send a mail to user1@domain and user2@domain, postfix will use a single queue file. I'm trying to avoid this, because I need to put mail on HOLD based on a single RC