Le 13/01/2011 22:06, Jonathan Tripathy a écrit :
>
> On 13/01/11 19:00, Jaques Cochet wrote:
>> After some reading:
>> - GFS and maildir work bad together
>> - NFS and maildir are not that good, NFS and postfix have some issues
>> but should be OK.
>>
> Where did you read that GFS worked badly wit
On 13/01/2011 22:06, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On 13/01/11 19:00, Jaques Cochet wrote:
After some reading:
- GFS and maildir work bad together
- NFS and maildir are not that good, NFS and postfix have some issues
but should be OK.
Where did you read that GFS worked badly with maildir? I'd be i
Hi Jaques,
Ah yes, I remember reading those. I don't think you have too much to
worry about in 2011 though. Those posts were from around 2008 when GFS
(The original implementation) didn't scale well for large mailboxes. It
was also around the time that GFS2 wasn't stable for production
enviro
Jonathan, check
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/TUhSn61Ee1e4CqmzNaTd
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/linux-clus...@redhat.com/msg07430.html
http://old.nabble.com/Dovecot-performance-on-GFS-clustered-filesystem-td19655678.html
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
On 13/01/11 19:00, Jaques Cochet wrote:
After some reading:
- GFS and maildir work bad together
- NFS and maildir are not that good, NFS and postfix have some issues
but should be OK.
Where did you read that GFS worked badly with maildir? I'd be interested
to read into this
Thanks
After some reading:
- GFS and maildir work bad together
- NFS and maildir are not that good, NFS and postfix have some issues
but should be OK.
I read that OCFS2 is promising. If it works good, I can use an IMAP
proxy and run IMAP on backend servers with postfix. As for SMTP
relaying/scanning and
Le 13/01/2011 13:46, Jan-Frode Myklebust a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:38:05AM -0200, Deives Michellis wrote:
>> Perdition works WITH dovecot (or whatever imap server you use). It's
>> just a proxy - will redirect connections based on username, origin,
>> etc...
>
> Yes, I know, and "dove
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:38:05AM -0200, Deives Michellis wrote:
> Perdition works WITH dovecot (or whatever imap server you use). It's
> just a proxy - will redirect connections based on username, origin,
> etc...
Yes, I know, and "dovecot director" also works with dovecot (or any
other imap ser
Perdition works WITH dovecot (or whatever imap server you use). It's
just a proxy - will redirect connections based on username, origin,
etc...
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:59:26AM -0200, Deives Michellis wrote:
> Have you guys considered using Perdition to proxy/redirect IMAP/POP to
> distribute backend storage to as many as backends as you want?
Yes, but I prefer dovecot (since that's what we're running on the
backend POP/IMAP-servers). I
Have you guys considered using Perdition to proxy/redirect IMAP/POP to
distribute backend storage to as many as backends as you want? You
wont need any SAN/NAS/NFS/GFS/whatever, just a user/storage mapping
(ldap, mysql, etc...), and you might even add spare or active/active
servers to each storage
Take a look at http://www.dbmail.org/ for imap/pop3
you can have as many servers you want connected with the
same database, i would use dovecot as proxy and for sasl-auth
which would give you even the option to use mysql-slaves
fpr the readonly-requests to spread the database-load
Am 13.01.2011 0
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 07:36:12AM +0200, Jaques Cochet wrote:
>
> I'm working on a mail system design for an ISP that includes hosting
> of multiple virtual domains managed by this ISP (300.000 mailbox). HA
> and performance are both important concerns for the client, so I have
> at least 2 of ev
Thank you both, and sorry for not noticing Jonathan's recent post.
I'll read a bit and get back.
Omar
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
>
> On 13/01/11 05:42, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>>
>> On 13/01/11 05:36, Jaques Cochet wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I'm working on a mail
On 13/01/11 05:42, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On 13/01/11 05:36, Jaques Cochet wrote:
Hi
I'm working on a mail system design for an ISP that includes hosting
of multiple virtual domains managed by this ISP (300.000 mailbox). HA
and performance are both important concerns for the client, so I h
+--
| On 2011-01-13 07:36:12, Jaques Cochet wrote:
|
| I'm working on a mail system design for an ISP that includes hosting
| of multiple virtual domains managed by this ISP (300.000 mailbox). HA
| and performance are both
On 13/01/11 05:36, Jaques Cochet wrote:
Hi
I'm working on a mail system design for an ISP that includes hosting
of multiple virtual domains managed by this ISP (300.000 mailbox). HA
and performance are both important concerns for the client, so I have
at least 2 of every server (webmail, pop3,
Hi
I'm working on a mail system design for an ISP that includes hosting
of multiple virtual domains managed by this ISP (300.000 mailbox). HA
and performance are both important concerns for the client, so I have
at least 2 of every server (webmail, pop3, imap, relay and smtp
(postfix)) for which i
18 matches
Mail list logo
