On Behalf Of Simon
>
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
> mail-in2.{ourdomain}.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038A71278B for
> ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:21:11 +1300 (NZDT)
> X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail-in2.{ourdomain}.net
> Received: from mail-in2.{ourdomain}.net ([127.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:56 AM, mouss wrote:
> 1) nothing in your sample shows that you use postfix.
> if using postfix, why is Return-Path in the middle of headers?
>
> 2) given the return-path you show, this is not backscatter. maybe you
> meant envelope sender forgery?
>
> 3) 93.85.177.92 i
Le 22/03/2011 05:38, Simon a écrit :
> Hi There,
>
> We are using postfix on debian lenny. Everything is mysql backed and
> we are using amavisd-new (spamassassin with daily updates from
> saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org & clam-av),
> postfix-policy greylisting and postfix-p
Am 22.03.2011 05:38, schrieb Simon:
> Hi There,
>
> We are using postfix on debian lenny. Everything is mysql backed and
> we are using amavisd-new (spamassassin with daily updates from
> saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org & clam-av),
> postfix-policy greylisting and postfix-po
Hi There,
We are using postfix on debian lenny. Everything is mysql backed and
we are using amavisd-new (spamassassin with daily updates from
saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org & clam-av),
postfix-policy greylisting and postfix-policyd-spf-python. All updates
applied.
But we a