Re: Fwd: preventing backscatter with virtual_alias_maps

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:08 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > yes, the term "virtual" is overloaded. and one may ask what is not > virtual in networking/computing. but that's it. you can't change names > when they are widely used. There are examples in other areas: > > Agree! The "loc

Re: Fwd: preventing backscatter with virtual_alias_maps

D G Teed a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:20 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > D G Teed a écrit : > > I'd like to see an example of a set up where we could use > relay_domains > > and provide the flexibility of sending to any of our inbox s

Re: Fwd: preventing backscatter with virtual_alias_maps

D G Teed wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:20 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > D G Teed a écrit : > > I'd like to see an example of a set up where we could use > relay_domains > > and provide the flexibility of sending to any of our inbox serve

Fwd: preventing backscatter with virtual_alias_maps

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:20 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > D G Teed a écrit : > > I'd like to see an example of a set up where we could use relay_domains > > and provide the flexibility of sending to any of our inbox servers > > within our domain, or forwarding a particular addresses ema