> On Apr 1, 2017, at 4:19 PM, Rick Zeman wrote:
>
> Comcast, surprisingly, is way ahead of the residential game:
I am not surprised. In addition to having IPv6 they also have
DNSSEC deployed, and have published working DANE TLSA records
for their MX hosts. Bottom line, SMTP at Comcast is acti
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Paul C wrote:
> I wish the world would use ipv6 enough for this to be worth doing, but
> it's not going to have much benefit to you as there's almost no one
> using it for smtp, from the last time I checked which was a few months
> ago, google uses it perfectly, ve
On 03/26/2017 02:48 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Doug Barton skrev den 2017-03-26 22:16:
On 03/26/2017 12:21 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
So while a suggestion not to care about IPv6 may have been valid in
2014. It is simply wrong in 2017.
Here here! And keep in mind that mobile providers are primar
Doug Barton skrev den 2017-03-26 22:16:
On 03/26/2017 12:21 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
So while a suggestion not to care about IPv6 may have been valid in
2014. It is simply wrong in 2017.
Here here! And keep in mind that mobile providers are primarily v6
nowadays, so those numbers are only goin
On 03/26/2017 12:21 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
So while a suggestion not to care about IPv6 may have been valid in
2014. It is simply wrong in 2017.
Here here! And keep in mind that mobile providers are primarily v6
nowadays, so those numbers are only going up.
Doug
Am 26.03.2017 um 21:21 schrieb Dirk Stöcker:
> Checking my current logfiles of the last few days and stripping all duplicate
> entries (IP addresses or domain names indicate they are same) I get following
> results (for outgoing TLS connections):
>
> Server 1: 5 / 24 == 17% IPv6
> Server 2: 12
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Paul C wrote:
I wish the world would use ipv6 enough for this to be worth doing, but
it's not going to have much benefit to you as there's almost no one
using it for smtp, from the last time I checked which was a few months
ago, google uses it perfectly, verizon too (maybe a
On 25/03/17 14:43, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix can be configured to try IPv6 before IPv4 (with
> smtp_address_preference), but that feature is independent from
> routing features such as transport_maps, smtp_fallback_relay, and
> so on. That is, there are no ipv6_transport_maps or
> ipv4_smtp_
> On Mar 25, 2017, at 9:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> See
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#inet_protocols
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_address_preference
>>
>> If IPv6 is explicitly preferred, rather than randomly selected as with:
>>
>> smtp_address_prefer
On 03/25/2017 06:43 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mar 25, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Postfix can be configured to try IPv6 before IPv4 (with
smtp_address_preference)
Regarding that option, I've never understood the warning in postconf(5).
Doesn't that feature provide precedence,
> On Mar 25, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Postfix can be configured to try IPv6 before IPv4 (with
>> smtp_address_preference)
>
> Regarding that option, I've never understood the warning in postconf(5).
> Doesn't that feature provide precedence, not exclusivity? Or put a different
On 03/25/2017 07:43 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix can be configured to try IPv6 before IPv4 (with
smtp_address_preference)
Regarding that option, I've never understood the warning in postconf(5).
Doesn't that feature provide precedence, not exclusivity? Or put a
different way, if the site
--
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] De la part de Wietse Venema
> Envoyé : samedi 25 mars 2017 15:44
> À : Postfix users
> Objet : Re: Fallback to IPV4 in case of IPV6 is not available
>
owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] De la part de Wietse Venema
Envoyé : samedi 25 mars 2017 15:44
À : Postfix users
Objet : Re: Fallback to IPV4 in case of IPV6 is not available
Postfix can be configured to try IPv6 before IPv4 (with
smtp_address_preference), but
Postfix can be configured to try IPv6 before IPv4 (with
smtp_address_preference), but that feature is independent from
routing features such as transport_maps, smtp_fallback_relay, and
so on. That is, there are no ipv6_transport_maps or
ipv4_smtp_fallback_relay features.
I suggest you just keep se
Hi,
My ISP is blocking outside SMTP connection except their own SMTP relay with
authentication, so
I've in /etc/transport
* smtp:smtp.domain.com:587 with SASL configuration to authenticate
I recently activated the IPV6 configuration on my BOX and I'm able to
connect to an IPV6 Address on p
16 matches
Mail list logo
