John Allen:
[LMTP daemon or pipe-to-command?]
Wietse:
> A resident LMTP daemon uses fewer CPU cycles than a process that
> is created once for each delivery, but with 30 users the difference
> matters only if you have a 15-year old computer (i.e. the technology
> that was available when I started
Am 28.12.2012 18:38, schrieb John Allen:
>> A resident LMTP daemon uses fewer CPU cycles than a process that
>> is created once for each delivery, but with 30 users the difference
>> matters only if you have a 15-year old computer (i.e. the technology
>> that was available when I started work on
On 23/12/2012 9:05 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
John Allen:
I am using Dovecot as my mail delivery mechanism for both local and
virtual users, plus using it as my SASL auth agent.
My setup is for a small business (average 30 users).
The mail system is on a single server.
Which would be better unix/
John Allen:
> I am using Dovecot as my mail delivery mechanism for both local and
> virtual users, plus using it as my SASL auth agent.
> My setup is for a small business (average 30 users).
> The mail system is on a single server.
> Which would be better unix/pipes and LDA or LMTP.
A resident LM
Am 23.12.2012 16:24, schrieb John Allen:
> I am using Dovecot as my mail delivery mechanism for both local and virtual
> users, plus using it as my SASL auth agent.
> My setup is for a small business (average 30 users).
> The mail system is on a single server.
> Which would be better unix/pipes
I am using Dovecot as my mail delivery mechanism for both local and
virtual users, plus using it as my SASL auth agent.
My setup is for a small business (average 30 users).
The mail system is on a single server.
Which would be better unix/pipes and LDA or LMTP.
TIA
JohnA
--
"He who opens a sch
