>Sadly, the opendkim library does not support applying two signatures in
>parallel (set up two signing contexts, pass the message content through
>once, get two sigatures). So I have to pass the message through the
>library twice, to apply two signatures. Not a show-stopper, but annoying.
If we as
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:34:09AM -, John Levine wrote:
> >Does it make sense in your view to use the "From:" domain to sign
> >*all* mail, and not add that domain to the DNSWL, while reserving
> >a sub-domain (that never matches "From:") for the good senders, and
> >applying a *second* signa
>> Do NOT look up rDNS in the DWL. If you do, you will get random
>> results, since we have no idea what rDNS our clients use.
>
>Noted. The feature is not SpamHaus specific, and other WLs may support
>rDNS domains, but we should perhaps add a note in the docs about SpamHaus,
>since your list will
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:48:03AM -, John Levine wrote:
> Do NOT look up rDNS in the DWL. If you do, you will get random
> results, since we have no idea what rDNS our clients use.
Noted. The feature is not SpamHaus specific, and other WLs may support
rDNS domains, but we should perhaps add
My apologies for shouting, but this wrong idea just won't go away:
> If Postfix can't determine the client's reverse domain
>(tempfail) and therefore cannot even ask SpamHaus whether the
>(verified) client (PTR) domain is on the whitelist,
NO! NO, NO, NO!
Do NOT look up rDNS in the DWL. If
