On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 11:30:08PM +1300, Peter wrote:
> On 18/02/17 22:56, Chris Green wrote:
> > The older (2.9.6) and newer (3.1.0) postfix versions that I'm using
> > are connecting to the same smarthost. I don't seem to be able to
> > connect from the 3.1.0 version to the submission service o
On 18/02/17 22:56, Chris Green wrote:
> The older (2.9.6) and newer (3.1.0) postfix versions that I'm using
> are connecting to the same smarthost. I don't seem to be able to
> connect from the 3.1.0 version to the submission service on 587 for
> some reason.
At a WAG you have smtp_tls_wrappermod
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:11:44PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Feb 17, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > OK, so the older version is using SMTP STARTTLS which runs on port 587
>
> This is how TLS has worked in MTA-to-MTA SMTP for the last > 15 years.
>
> https://too
> On Feb 17, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Chris Green wrote:
>
> OK, so the older version is using SMTP STARTTLS which runs on port 587
This is how TLS has worked in MTA-to-MTA SMTP for the last > 15 years.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3207
> and the newer (>=3) version is using TLS directly o
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:24:54PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Feb 17, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > Ah, I've maybe just spotted the reason, smtp_tls_wrappermode is new in
> > postfix 3, is that what makes the difference?
>
> Yes.
>
> > I'd still like a simple explan
> On Feb 17, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Chris Green wrote:
>
> Ah, I've maybe just spotted the reason, smtp_tls_wrappermode is new in
> postfix 3, is that what makes the difference?
Yes.
> I'd still like a simple explanation though! :-)
That's the simple explanation. SMTP directly over TLS requires
On 2017-02-17 (12:38 MST), "Fazzina, Angelo" wrote:
>
> I thought the master.cf file is where you config what protocol to listen for ?
He is SENDING outbound mail to his upstream, not listening for incoming mail.
As for the original post, 587 is the right port to use anyway, so ignore your
ISP
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 07:35:42PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> [snip long message]
>
> Sorry about the duplicate, you can see I really am having trouble with
> my E-Mail! :-)
>
... and I'm talking rubbish anyway, I've got two subscriptions! Aarrgghh!!
--
Chris Green
2017 10:43 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Different treatment of ports 465 and 587 between postfix versions
> 2.9 and 3.1
>
> I am running postfix 3.1.0 on an xubuntu 16.04 system and postfix 2.9.6
> on a Raspberry Pi running Debian.
>
> They seem to act very differen
-9075
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Green
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 10:43 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Different treatment of ports 465 and 587 between postfix versions 2.9
and 3.1
I am ru
[snip long message]
Sorry about the duplicate, you can see I really am having trouble with
my E-Mail! :-)
--
Chris Green
I am running postfix 3.1.0 on an xubuntu 16.04 system and postfix 2.9.6
on a Raspberry Pi running Debian.
They seem to act very differently as regards the use of ports 465 and
587 and I'd like things clarified so I can understand better.
I use both postfix installations to send outgoing E-Mail (i
12 matches
Mail list logo
