Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
> Hi Wietse,
>
> thanks for addressing this issue, a scaling solution for this problem will be
> really appreciated.
>
> We are an E-Mail Marketing provider and offer a hosted solution for a broad
> customer base for which we want to be able separate the reputation (
Hi Wietse,
thanks for addressing this issue, a scaling solution for this problem will be
really appreciated.
We are an E-Mail Marketing provider and offer a hosted solution for a broad
customer base for which we want to be able separate the reputation (so
individual customers can take part in
Noel Jones:
> > Is "DUNNO" the right choice here? This is not an access(5) table, and
> > "DUNNO" may muddy the user's understanding or expectations? If we really
> > want to allow one to make exceptions for specific users or sub-domains
> > without explicitly specifying the default transport, I th
On 11/21/2009 9:54 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:11:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
[ Robust/neat idea to support sender dependent transport selection. ]
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps (default: empty)
A sender-dependent override for the global defau
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:11:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> [ Robust/neat idea to support sender dependent transport selection. ]
> sender_dependent_default_transport_maps (default: empty)
>A sender-dependent override for the global default_transport parameter
>setting. The
Recently there have been requests for sending mail with source IP
addresses that depend on the envelope sender. Sometimes the request
appeared to be related to showshoe spamming, and sometimes it
appeared to be a legitimate attempt to protect IP-based domain
reputations of different customers.
Cur
