Re: Delivery rate

Hi Bastian, * Bastian Blank am 28.07.11, 17:13: > Please provide more information what you want to do. sorry, please see my reply <20110729061552.GA3407@bvl-bsn004> Thanks, Martin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Delivery rate

Hi Andreas, sorry for the personal reply, here again as a List-Reply. * lst_ho...@kwsoft.de am 28.07.11, 17:43: > You have omitted some relevant facts: > > - The performance of the I/O system (bandwidth/latency)?

Re: Delivery rate

Zitat von Martin Bley : Hi list, does anybody have experienced data about the delivery rate of a single postfix smtp server in the following scenario - server is a Dell PowerEdge 2850 - 2x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU - 4 GiB memory - running a caching DNS resolver locally - 75 MiBit/s backbone

Re: Delivery rate

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:42:59PM +0200, Martin Bley wrote: > does anybody have experienced data about the delivery rate of a single > postfix smtp server in the following scenario Something between 2/s, if everything needs to go through a single spamassassin process doing expensive test

Delivery rate

Hi list, does anybody have experienced data about the delivery rate of a single postfix smtp server in the following scenario - server is a Dell PowerEdge 2850 - 2x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU - 4 GiB memory - running a caching DNS resolver locally - 75 MiBit/s backbone to the internet Thanks

Re: Delivery rate drops soon after restart

Ram: > >> Ram: > >>> I have a postfix (2.7) server where as soon as I restart the mails are > >>> moved rapidly from incoming queue to active > >>> > >>> But soon ( after 5 minutes ) the queue manager is left behind .. the > >>> incoming queue keeps increasing 10k+ but active queue has hardly 1

Re: Delivery rate drops soon after restart

On 03/17/2011 10:11 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:04:31AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: Ram: I have a postfix (2.7) server where as soon as I restart the mails are moved rapidly from incoming queue to active But soon ( after 5 minutes ) the queue manager is left behi

Re: Delivery rate drops soon after restart

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:04:31AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ram: > > I have a postfix (2.7) server where as soon as I restart the mails are > > moved rapidly from incoming queue to active > > > > But soon ( after 5 minutes ) the queue manager is left behind .. the > > incoming queue kee

Re: Delivery rate drops soon after restart

Ram: > I have a postfix (2.7) server where as soon as I restart the mails are > moved rapidly from incoming queue to active > > But soon ( after 5 minutes ) the queue manager is left behind .. the > incoming queue keeps increasing 10k+ but active queue has hardly 10-15 > mails > After che

Delivery rate drops soon after restart

I have a postfix (2.7) server where as soon as I restart the mails are moved rapidly from incoming queue to active But soon ( after 5 minutes ) the queue manager is left behind .. the incoming queue keeps increasing 10k+ but active queue has hardly 10-15 mails After checking http://www.p

Re: Limiting delivery rate for a specific destination

Oh thanks ! This is great ;) Regards Lionel 2010/12/20 mouss > Le 20/12/2010 10:39, Lionel TRESSENS a écrit : > >> Hello Postfix happy users ! >> >> I am trying to figure out if it is possible to limit the delivery >> concurrency for some destinations. >> >> For example : >> - emails matchi

Re: Limiting delivery rate for a specific destination

Le 20/12/2010 10:39, Lionel TRESSENS a écrit : Hello Postfix happy users ! I am trying to figure out if it is possible to limit the delivery concurrency for some destinations. For example : - emails matching patterns "@foo.com " and "@bar.com " must be sent wit

Limiting delivery rate for a specific destination

Hello Postfix happy users ! I am trying to figure out if it is possible to limit the delivery concurrency for some destinations. For example : - emails matching patterns "@foo.com" and "@bar.com" must be sent with a slow delivery concurrency - other emails must be sent with (let's say) default

Re: throttling delivery rate question (SOLVED?)

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:13:31PM -0600, Steve Lindemann wrote: > yesterday I applied a change based on something I saw in another thread > and it *seems* to have worked: > > smtp_connection_cache_destinations = !dummy.edu, static:all > This changes behaviour for all domains other than the on

Re: throttling delivery rate question (SOLVED?)

Steve Lindemann: > Victor Duchovni wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:32:06PM -0600, Steve Lindemann wrote: > > > >> fyi... the systems giving me the most grief all use ironport filters and > >> they all started complaining within a few days of each other. I suspect > >> some software update

Re: throttling delivery rate question (SOLVED?)

Victor Duchovni wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:32:06PM -0600, Steve Lindemann wrote: fyi... the systems giving me the most grief all use ironport filters and they all started complaining within a few days of each other. I suspect some software update on the ironport but need data to prove

Re: throttling delivery rate question

On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:32:06PM -0600, Steve Lindemann wrote: > fyi... the systems giving me the most grief all use ironport filters and > they all started complaining within a few days of each other. I suspect > some software update on the ironport but need data to prove I'm not > "overwhe

Re: throttling delivery rate question

Wietse Venema wrote: Steve Lindemann: My problem is that I support a number of email lists (using mailman), none are particularly big or busy and, until recently, have been chugging merrily along without a problem. However, a number of domains we deliver to have suddenly started complaining a

Re: throttling delivery rate question

Steve Lindemann: > My problem is that I support a number of email lists (using mailman), > none are particularly big or busy and, until recently, have been > chugging merrily along without a problem. However, a number of domains > we deliver to have suddenly started complaining and my outbound

throttling delivery rate question

First off, I'm not a postfix expert... in fact I'm no kind of expert, just a very well rounded jack of all trades. My current install is fairly generic and I know there are plenty of places it could be improved (and I would welcome constructive criticism). My problem is that I support a numbe