On 28 Jun 2018, at 16:10, li...@mbchandler.net wrote:
> I agree about the nameserver, but unfortunately I don't have a choice. I'm
> required to use this one.
Explain to the non-technical person mandating this, possibly using very small
words, why the will result in lost mail. Your initial post
On 28.06.18 17:10, li...@mbchandler.net wrote:
I agree about the nameserver, but unfortunately I don't have a choice.
I'm required to use this one.
required how, or by whom?
If you are required to use a broken server, you should explain it leads to
providing broken mail service.
I'm not sure
> On Jun 28, 2018, at 6:10 PM, li...@mbchandler.net wrote:
>
> I agree about the nameserver, but unfortunately I don't have a choice. I'm
> required to use this one.
>
> I'm not as familiar with DNS as I should be, but is there a temporary error
> code the nameserver could return instead, th
I agree about the nameserver, but unfortunately I don't have a choice.
I'm required to use this one.
I'm not as familiar with DNS as I should be, but is there a temporary
error code the nameserver could return instead, that would cause Postfix
to defer this mail?
Another question. As far as
> On Jun 28, 2018, at 3:23 PM, li...@mbchandler.net wrote:
>
> I have email relays that relay/filter email between the internet and our
> internal network. I must use the DNS servers we maintain and those servers
> use a DNS blacklisting service. The problem I'm having is that when a
> legit
I have email relays that relay/filter email between the internet and our
internal network. I must use the DNS servers we maintain and those
servers use a DNS blacklisting service. The problem I'm having is that
when a legitimate domain is blacklisted, I see log messages like the
ones below and
