Re: Defeating 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'

2013-06-07 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 6/7/2013 11:28 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > Generally only internal systems and spammers use IP literals for the > HELO hostname. I wouldn't recommend it. Absolutely. > I would suggest not using "123-243-137-139.static.tpgi.com.au" as > your HELO, since that's what all the spam bots do. Some fol

Re: Defeating 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'

2013-06-07 Thread Noel Jones
On 6/7/2013 7:46 AM, Nikolas Kallis wrote: > Hello, > > > > Before I had my ISP setup my IP address's PTR record to resolve to > one of my domains, my IP address resolved to > '123-243-137-139.static.tpgi.com.au'. If I had used > '[123.243.137.139]' as the host name of my mail server, would a >

Re: Defeating 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'

2013-06-07 Thread Petar Bogdanovic
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:46:46PM +1000, Nikolas Kallis wrote: > (...) 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname' (...) reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname will make your life miserable and block very little spam, assuming this third reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname related thread of yours is still about rejecting s

Defeating 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'

2013-06-07 Thread Nikolas Kallis
Hello, Before I had my ISP setup my IP address's PTR record to resolve to one of my domains, my IP address resolved to '123-243-137-139.static.tpgi.com.au'. If I had used '[123.243.137.139]' as the host name of my mail server, would a Postfix-based e-mail server enforcing 'reject_non_fqdn_h