On 6/7/2013 11:28 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Generally only internal systems and spammers use IP literals for the
> HELO hostname. I wouldn't recommend it.
Absolutely.
> I would suggest not using "123-243-137-139.static.tpgi.com.au" as
> your HELO, since that's what all the spam bots do. Some fol
On 6/7/2013 7:46 AM, Nikolas Kallis wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Before I had my ISP setup my IP address's PTR record to resolve to
> one of my domains, my IP address resolved to
> '123-243-137-139.static.tpgi.com.au'. If I had used
> '[123.243.137.139]' as the host name of my mail server, would a
>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:46:46PM +1000, Nikolas Kallis wrote:
> (...) 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname' (...)
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname will make your life miserable and block
very little spam, assuming this third reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
related thread of yours is still about rejecting s
Hello,
Before I had my ISP setup my IP address's PTR record to resolve to one
of my domains, my IP address resolved to
'123-243-137-139.static.tpgi.com.au'. If I had used '[123.243.137.139]'
as the host name of my mail server, would a Postfix-based e-mail server
enforcing 'reject_non_fqdn_h