On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:02:38PM +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> P.S. Maybe some is interested. I'm currently improving the "tlsa" tool from
> hash-slinger (https://github.com/letoams/hash-slinger) to properly support
> STARTTLS and SNI. Some changes are still pending, but I'm positive they will
>
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
There are just ~30 domains with TLSA records that large enough for you
to have heard of them. Here's a sample:
...
bund.de
Sadly that's only the main domain. Each subsection has own servers, so
bkg.bund.de does not support DANE ATM and that'
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:29:55PM +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> does anyone here have statistics about DANE enabled mail servers?
The majority of the domains are small ("vanity") domains of early
adopters like you. I've found ~9600 of these, but there at least
around 20,000 more (hosted by udmed
On 12/10/2015 9:29 AM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anyone here have statistics about DANE enabled mail servers? And
> maybe also a timeline showing an increase (hopefully)? I'm running DANE
> for some time now and I don't ever get a Verified connection (except to my
> second server).
I look forward to read the stats from https://dane.sys4.de/
On 12/10/15 3:29 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
Hello,
does anyone here have statistics about DANE enabled mail servers? And
maybe also a timeline showing an increase (hopefully)? I'm running
DANE for some time now and I don't ever get a
Hello,
does anyone here have statistics about DANE enabled mail servers? And
maybe also a timeline showing an increase (hopefully)? I'm running DANE
for some time now and I don't ever get a Verified connection (except to my
second server). That's a bit discouraging. I'd like to have at least o
