Simon Waters wrote:
> I have on my personal server for recipients:
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> permit_mynetworks,
>
>
> reject_unauth_destination
>
> Which I think is pretty typical, but there is proabbly no right way.
>
Some would consider this less than optimal for checking rbls
37 AM
Subject: Re: Correct order of parameters in main.cf
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 16:08:06 John King wrote:
>
> My question is - based on several postings where people advise that x line
> should precede y line or be listed after z - with regards to the auth
> sections and recipient res
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 16:08:06 John King wrote:
>
> My question is - based on several postings where people advise that x line
> should precede y line or be listed after z - with regards to the auth
> sections and recipient restrictions etc etc... Is there a set order in
> which these elemts sh
* Brian Evans - Postfix List :
> Understand that Postfix does not evaluate line order.
unless in smtpd_*_restrictions
> The most critical restriction is reject_unauth_destination. Placement
> of check_recipient_access or check_sender access before this in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions *may* le
John King wrote:
> All, please forgive this question if it seems to be a silly one
>
> I regard most of the posters to this forum as being experts and truly vaule
> the information found in your responses to questions and threads. I am a
> consultant trying to provide secure email services to
All, please forgive this question if it seems to be a silly one
I regard most of the posters to this forum as being experts and truly vaule the
information found in your responses to questions and threads. I am a consultant
trying to provide secure email services to my clients and am lookin
