On 2010-03-28 8:15 PM, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> And, I didn't mean to hijack the thread earlier - I meant to change
> the subject line - oops...
Changing the subject line of an existing thread to start a new thread is
*the definition* of hijacking a thread.
When you want to start a new thread,
On Mar 28, 2010, at 19:28, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:51:27 -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu
> articulated:
>
>> After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix
>> I have installed. The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is
>> "postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2." It's inte
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:51:27 -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu
articulated:
> After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix
> I have installed. The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is
> "postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2." It's interesting that both of these Linux
> versions offer
Original Message
Subject: Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:14:43 +0200
From: fakessh
To: "Roderick A. Anderson"
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:00:08 -0700, "Roderick A. Anderson"
wrote:
> Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
On Mar 28, 2010, at 15:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
BTW, Postfix 2.3 is no longer maintained. It is almost four years old.
Wietse,
After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix I have installed.
The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is "p
On Mar 28, 2010, at 15:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
> BTW, Postfix 2.3 is no longer maintained. It is almost four years old.
Wietse,
After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix I have
installed. The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is
"postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2." I
Frank Reid:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > To prove that POSTFIX is at fault you need to demonstrate that
> > ONE message with MULTIPLE recipients results in MULTIPLE deliveries.
>
> I did some tests, and it appears it only happens when addressing the virtual
> domain. POSTFIX does only one "RC
Frank Reid:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > To prove that POSTFIX is at fault you need to demonstrate that
> > ONE message with MULTIPLE recipients results in MULTIPLE deliveries.
>
> I did some tests, and it appears it only happens when addressing the virtual
> domain. POSTFIX does only one "RC
Wietse Venema wrote:
> To prove that POSTFIX is at fault you need to demonstrate that
> ONE message with MULTIPLE recipients results in MULTIPLE deliveries.
I did some tests, and it appears it only happens when addressing the virtual
domain. POSTFIX does only one "RCPT TO" for normal (local o
Frank Reid:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Yes it is possible. However, I need to warn you first about a
> > mis-conception.
>
> > The To: header is NOT a reliable indicator of the intended recipient.
>
> Understand. I have no intention to sort out or deliver this mail by other
> means from th
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Yes it is possible. However, I need to warn you first about a
> mis-conception.
> The To: header is NOT a reliable indicator of the intended recipient.
Understand. I have no intention to sort out or deliver this mail by other
means from the destination mailbox. It's f
Frank Reid:
> Scenario: I would like to deliver all mail for the @example.com domain to a
> single mailbox as a single delivery (to preserve header information). I
> have set up:
>
> -- main.cf
> virtual_alias_domains = example.com
> virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
>
> -- virtual
Scenario: I would like to deliver all mail for the @example.com domain to a
single mailbox as a single delivery (to preserve header information). I
have set up:
-- main.cf
virtual_alias_domains = example.com
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
-- virtual
@example.com mail...@mydomai
13 matches
Mail list logo
