John Allen:
> Just got around to implementing this, When I read the postfix docs about
> sql lookups they do not mention "permit" are you using the term as a
> generality (OK, dunno ) or as a defined response?
The access(5) manpage is dominated by actions access-map specific
actions.
In the
On 2016-04-14 12:40 PM, John Allen wrote:
16-04-14 9:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
John Allen:
Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition.
For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup"
under
submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something lik
16-04-14 9:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
John Allen:
Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition.
For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under
submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like
!check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrcti
Wietse Venema:
> John Allen:
> > Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition.
> > For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under
> > submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like
> > !check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrctions
> >
> > The idea bei
John Allen:
> Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition.
> For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under
> submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like
> !check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrctions
>
> The idea being that if example.com is all
Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition.
For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under
submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like
!check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrctions
The idea being that if example.com is allowed access via submis
