> On Mar 10, 2017, at 12:03 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> Sure, you can do what you want, and in theory it sounds prudent to
> exempt postmaster & abuse from spam controls, but in practice, it
> turns out only to be a way to get yourself a lot more spam.
>
> I don't have enough rejections to be ab
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:12:32PM -0800, MRob wrote:
> On 2017-03-09 14:35, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:44:04PM -0800, MRob wrote:
> >>Are there any admins with opinions where in the order is best
> >>for postmaster/abuse whitelisting?
> >
> >My opinion is "don't do it." I use
On 2017-03-09 14:35, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:44:04PM -0800, MRob wrote:
Are there any admins with opinions where in the order is best
for postmaster/abuse whitelisting?
My opinion is "don't do it." I use smtpd_reject_footer to point to
my web page for frustrated human send
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:44:04PM -0800, MRob wrote:
> Are there any admins with opinions where in the order is best
> for postmaster/abuse whitelisting?
My opinion is "don't do it." I use smtpd_reject_footer to point to
my web page for frustrated human senders. If they're not smart
enough to
On 2017-03-08 15:23, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/8/2017 2:53 PM, MRob wrote:
Hello all,
Is there a best practices for exempting the postmaster/abuse address
from certain smtpd_mumble_restrictions?
The procedure to whitelist a recipient is to use a
check_recipient_access map prior to whatever rul
On 2017-03-08 Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/8/2017 2:53 PM, MRob wrote:
>> Is there a best practices for exempting the postmaster/abuse address
>> from certain smtpd_mumble_restrictions?
>
> The procedure to whitelist a recipient is to use a
> check_recipient_access map prior to whatever rule might rej
On 3/8/2017 2:53 PM, MRob wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Is there a best practices for exempting the postmaster/abuse address
> from certain smtpd_mumble_restrictions?
>
The procedure to whitelist a recipient is to use a
check_recipient_access map prior to whatever rule might reject the
mail. If you
Hello all,
Is there a best practices for exempting the postmaster/abuse address
from certain smtpd_mumble_restrictions?
For example, we see some small businesses who have trouble getting past
reject_unknown_helo_hostname and reject_unknown_client_hostname and if
we reach out to them, we need
