Wietse Venema:
> Nikolas Kallis:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Postfix has a bug in it where argument 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'
> > causes Postfix to reject mail from a client who is using an address
> > literal as their 'helo' command.
>
> Your claim is valid. Address literals in HELO must be enclo
On 6/7/2013 5:46 AM, Nikolas Kallis wrote:
> Postfix has a bug in it where argument 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'
> causes Postfix to reject mail from a client who is using an address
> literal as their 'helo' command.
>
> This in breach of RFC 2821 under section 4.1.1.1.
You can also enforce
Postfix has a bug in it where argument 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'
causes Postfix to reject mail from a client who is using an address
literal as their 'helo' command.
Your claim is valid. Address literals in HELO must be enclosed in [].
I am a little confused. Were you just correcting me
Nikolas Kallis:
> Hello,
>
> Postfix has a bug in it where argument 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'
> causes Postfix to reject mail from a client who is using an address
> literal as their 'helo' command.
Your claim is valid. Address literals in HELO must be enclosed in [].
Wietse
Hello,
Postfix has a bug in it where argument 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname'
causes Postfix to reject mail from a client who is using an address
literal as their 'helo' command.
This in breach of RFC 2821 under section 4.1.1.1.
Regards,
Nikolas Kallis