Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Thomas Bolioli :
>
> > This is an interesting. You are saying run amavisd as an MTA in
> > between postfix and the sending MTA to reject the spammy/virus
> > messages inbound and then send off to postfix everything else for
> > delivery. What happens to non deliverables? They
* Thomas Bolioli :
> This is an interesting. You are saying run amavisd as an MTA in
> between postfix and the sending MTA to reject the spammy/virus
> messages inbound and then send off to postfix everything else for
> delivery. What happens to non deliverables? They will make it through
> the fi
Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/11/2009 12:53 PM, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
This is an interesting. You are saying run amavisd as an MTA in between
postfix and the sending MTA to reject the spammy/virus messages inbound
and then send off to postfix everything else for delivery. What happens
to non deliver
On 12/11/2009 12:53 PM, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
This is an interesting. You are saying run amavisd as an MTA in between
postfix and the sending MTA to reject the spammy/virus messages inbound
and then send off to postfix everything else for delivery. What happens
to non deliverables? They will make
This is an interesting. You are saying run amavisd as an MTA in between
postfix and the sending MTA to reject the spammy/virus messages inbound
and then send off to postfix everything else for delivery. What happens
to non deliverables? They will make it through the first transaction. Or
does a
Our recipient users are not keeping up with their obligations in this
scheme and instead are blaming us. We are trying to both remove reliance
on the user and put the onus on the sender to fix their issues as most
of the email getting bounced is poorly configured MTAs on the sender side.
(We d
Aside from anything else, it will really annoy the senders if the mail is
legitimate.
What annoys them even more is their message looking like it got through
and it ended up in the junk folder or dropped to dev null.
Terry Carmen wrote:
http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.
* Marty Anstey :
> I don't think you can pass messages directly to spamc/spamd in a
> before-queue scenario.
Yes, that's because it doesn't speak SMTP
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdam
* Thomas Bolioli :
> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
The document describes rejection of unknown recipients.
The document is misnomed, since no bouncing takes place but a simple
rejection.
> I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring
> postfix to bo
On 12/10/2009 8:09 PM, Marty Anstey wrote:
Rejecting messages inline is a far better solution than generating a
bounce or simply dropping the message. Most, if not all spam has a
forged sender so generating a bounce is a very bad idea. Rejecting
inline is much better than dropping message; at le
>> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
>>
>> I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix
>> to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't
>> seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error
>> if spa
> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
>
> I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix
> to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't
> seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error
> if spamc/spa
> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
>
> I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring
> postfix to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is
> complete. I can't seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs
> to get a 550 error if spamc/spa
Thomas Bolioli wrote:
http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix
to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't
seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 erro
http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix
to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't
seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error
if spamc/spamd deter
15 matches
Mail list logo
