On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:53:16 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Berton articulated:
>
>
> This post might not that indirect belong to why this list does not
> use Return-Path. I ran a server ( not postfix) for many years, which
> ended up with too many mail was discrded or were taken to the side
> becouse I ha
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:53:16 +0100 (CET), Andreas Berton wrote:
probably have less than 50% to arrive and more serious for content
who
must be deliverd. And then we are not there yet.
remember the world would not end in 2012, its first in 2015 :-)
after reading, what did you try to tell ?
This post might not that indirect belong to why this list does not use
Return-Path. I ran a server ( not postfix) for many years, which ended up
with too many mail was discrded or were taken to the side becouse I had
the most elementary rules which was follow email protocols standard. I
felt
