Den 28-10-2010 13:01, Ralf Hildebrandt skrev:
* Martin Kruse Jensen:
Nice cmd - I'm sure I'll have much joy of that. Here's the full output:
If you like that, please check out "pfqueue" :)
<2...@grefta.dk>: user unknown. Command output: Invalid user specified.
So, find out why mail for 2...
* Martin Kruse Jensen :
> Nice cmd - I'm sure I'll have much joy of that. Here's the full output:
If you like that, please check out "pfqueue" :)
> <2...@grefta.dk>: user unknown. Command output: Invalid user specified.
So, find out why mail for 2...@grefta.dk is being accepted...
In which map
* Martin Kruse Jensen :
> Den 28-10-2010 10:36, Ralf Hildebrandt skrev:
> >* Martin Kruse Jensen:
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >>I'm having quite some trouble trying to prevent backscatter on my
> >>postfix server. Mail queue is filled with undeliverable mailer daemon
> >>messages. Yesterday I added local_recipi
Den 28-10-2010 10:36, Ralf Hildebrandt skrev:
* Martin Kruse Jensen:
Hi.
I'm having quite some trouble trying to prevent backscatter on my
postfix server. Mail queue is filled with undeliverable mailer daemon
messages. Yesterday I added local_recipient_maps but it dosn't seem
to have helped...
* Martin Kruse Jensen :
> Hi.
>
> I'm having quite some trouble trying to prevent backscatter on my
> postfix server. Mail queue is filled with undeliverable mailer daemon
> messages. Yesterday I added local_recipient_maps but it dosn't seem
> to have helped...
WHAT exactly is bouncing? Check the
Hi.
I'm having quite some trouble trying to prevent backscatter on my
postfix server. Mail queue is filled with undeliverable mailer daemon
messages. Yesterday I added local_recipient_maps but it dosn't seem to
have helped...
My postconf -n follows:
alias_maps =
broken_sasl_auth_clients = ye
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> That's the funny thing, I'm using sbl-xbl spamhaus as well as
> spamcop.net but it wasn't blocked, I've now changed it to zen, I'm not
> sure though if it would have any effect.
The IP is not listed on SBL and was only listed on CBL (ergo XBL) at
2009-06-0
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:31 AM, kj
wrote:
> jan gestre wrote:
>>
>> Received: from 55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net
>> (55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.7.191.55])
>> by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEC4148041
>> for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:58:53 +0800 (PHT)
>> Mess
jan gestre wrote:
Received: from 55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net
(55.Red-88-7-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.7.191.55])
by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEC4148041
for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:58:53 +0800 (PHT)
Message-ID:
<365683314256959.dtwibjscpdre...@55.red-88-7-191.s
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> >>> I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
> >>> really is a backscatter problem, all I have right now is the
> >>> following:
> >>
> >> The message snippe
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:37 PM, jan gestre wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:31 PM, kj
> wrote:
>> jan gestre wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
>>> really is a backscatter problem, all I have
On Wed, 27 May 2009, kj wrote:
> jan gestre wrote:
>> I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
>> really is a backscatter problem, all I have right now is the
>> following:
>
> The message snippet is of no use. Can you post the full h
jan gestre wrote:
I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
really is a backscatter problem, all I have right now is the
following:
The message snippet is of no use. Can you post the full headers? That
and a corresponding log entry should clear things up.
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of jan gestre
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 5:00 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: BackScatter Problem
>
> > If it's backs
> If it's backscatter, it should be coming from <>, not a "valid company
> address". Please show your logs during delivery of the alleged backscatter.
>
I don't have anymore the logs from Postfix and I'm not sure if it
really is a backscatter proble
On Wed, 27 May 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> I've a backscatter problem wherein users receives emails from valid
> company addresses but based on content of the message it is obviously
> spam. I'm using postfix 2.5 with virtual domains using mysql + dovecot
> and mailscanner
Hi,
I've a backscatter problem wherein users receives emails from valid
company addresses but based on content of the message it is obviously
spam. I'm using postfix 2.5 with virtual domains using mysql + dovecot
and mailscanner and I've already read
http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCAT
Hi Magnus,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Monday, March 30, 2009 at 17:07 CEST,
Tom Diehl wrote:
I have a machine running postfix 2.2.8. I recently noticed that it is
putting messages in the queue for non-existent users and then trying
to send bounce messages. Can someone ple
On Monday, March 30, 2009 at 17:07 CEST,
Tom Diehl wrote:
> I have a machine running postfix 2.2.8. I recently noticed that it is
> putting messages in the queue for non-existent users and then trying
> to send bounce messages. Can someone please look at the following
> postconf -n output a
Tom Diehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a machine running postfix 2.2.8. I recently noticed that it is
> putting
> messages in the queue for non-existent users and then trying to send
> bounce
> messages. Can someone please look at the following postconf -n output
> and tell
> me what I have screwed up?
Hi,
I have a machine running postfix 2.2.8. I recently noticed that it is putting
messages in the queue for non-existent users and then trying to send bounce
messages. Can someone please look at the following postconf -n output and tell
me what I have screwed up? I really want to stop this but I
Gaston Dassieu Blanchet wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have found the below in my Postfix logs. I believe I have a
> backscatter problem, which seems to have gotten me in some SPAM black
> lists out there:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/root# cat /var/log/maillog* | grep 54EF0453B
>
Gaston Dassieu Blanchet wrote:
Dear All,
I have found the below in my Postfix logs. I believe I have a backscatter
problem, which seems to have gotten me in some SPAM black lists out there:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/root# cat /var/log/maillog* | grep 54EF0453B
Aug 18 18:26:19 Natsumi postfix
Dear All,
I have found the below in my Postfix logs. I believe I have a backscatter
problem, which seems to have gotten me in some SPAM black lists out there:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/root# cat /var/log/maillog* | grep 54EF0453B
Aug 18 18:26:19 Natsumi postfix/smtpd[12950]: 54EF0453B: client=
c
24 matches
Mail list logo
