Don't bounce you're overquota messages... just reject them :) at mail
gateway level at smtp dialogue, this way you will be saving resources on
scanning and later perhaps on bouncing them from any place :)
http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net
:) :)
> Mark Goodge schrieb:
>> Dan Slay wrote:
>>>
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 9/15/2009 5:44 AM:
> Ansgar Wiechers put forth on 9/15/2009 4:28 AM:
>
>> Then you can't avoid sending backscatter. Period. RFC 2821 clearly
>> states:
>>
>> | If an SMTP server has accepted the task of relaying the mail and
>> | later finds that the destination is incor
Ansgar Wiechers put forth on 9/15/2009 4:28 AM:
> Then you can't avoid sending backscatter. Period. RFC 2821 clearly
> states:
>
> | If an SMTP server has accepted the task of relaying the mail and
> | later finds that the destination is incorrect or that the mail
> | cannot be delivered for some
Dan Slay schrieb:
Thanks, that's what I have read. Which is why this make things more awkward.
I cannot see that holding a recipient list is a solution.
[...]
Hello Dan and others
Has anybody experiences with the sendmail milter 'scam-backscatter' by Eland
Systems? Maybe it may solve your pr
Mark Goodge schrieb:
> Dan Slay wrote:
>> Thanks, that's what I have read. Which is why this make things more
>> awkward.
>>
>> I cannot see that holding a recipient list is a solution. If, for
>> instance, you relay for thousands of domains all going to different
>> MTA's that hold each individual
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:12:52 +0100, Mark Goodge
wrote:
> Dan Slay wrote:
>> Thanks, that's what I have read. Which is why this make things more
>> awkward.
>>
>> I cannot see that holding a recipient list is a solution. If, for
>> instance, you relay for thousands of domains all going to differe
Dan Slay wrote:
Thanks, that's what I have read. Which is why this make things more awkward.
I cannot see that holding a recipient list is a solution. If, for
instance, you relay for thousands of domains all going to different
MTA's that hold each individual domains recipient list, its not rea
Thanks, that's what I have read. Which is why this make things more awkward.
I cannot see that holding a recipient list is a solution. If, for instance,
you relay for thousands of domains all going to different MTA's that hold
each individual domains recipient list, its not really that straight fo
On 2009-09-15 Dan Slay wrote:
> I'm looking for some information on preventing the sending of
> backscatter from a Postfix gateway mail server.
>
> The server itself does not and will not hold a recipient list,
Then you can't avoid sending backscatter. Period. RFC 2821 clearly
states:
| If an SM
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:45:53 +0100, Dan Slay
wrote:
> I'm looking for some information on preventing the sending of backscatter
> from a Postfix gateway mail server.
>
> The server itself does not and will not hold a recipient list, therefore
I
> don't know what the best way forward would be? The
I'm looking for some information on preventing the sending of backscatter
from a Postfix gateway mail server.
The server itself does not and will not hold a recipient list, therefore I
don't know what the best way forward would be? The server accepts for a
number of different domains.
Any advice
11 matches
Mail list logo
