On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:39:25PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > 2 What is Closing a DNS loophole with obsolete per-site TLS policies in
> > postfix TLS Documentation,Amavisd-new with TLS postfix generate is problem?
>
> Which DNS loophole?
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_tl
* gaby :
>
> I have 2 questions:
> 1 If Amavisd-new affect (damage) TLS functionality?
No
> 2 What is Closing a DNS loophole with obsolete per-site TLS policies in
> postfix TLS Documentation,Amavisd-new with TLS postfix generate is problem?
Which DNS loophole?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Gesch
-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: Amavis 1024-1025 ports combine with TLS
Am 17.06.2011 13:22, schrieb gaby:
> I want to use Postfix with TLS support ,but my postfix uses amavisd-new
> filter,mails use 1024 and 1025 ports for
> filtering in main.cf and
Am 17.06.2011 13:22, schrieb gaby:
> I want to use Postfix with TLS support ,but my postfix uses amavisd-new
> filter,mails use 1024 and 1025 ports for
> filtering in main.cf and master.cf
> It is affect my TLS comunication (port 465)? Is possible appear DNS loophole
> problem?
>
> main.cf
>
I want to use Postfix with TLS support ,but my postfix uses amavisd-new
filter,mails use 1024 and 1025 ports for filtering in main.cf and master.cf
It is affect my TLS comunication (port 465)? Is possible appear DNS loophole
problem?
Thank
main.cf
amavisfeed unix- - n -