Re: Adding a reply-to header when none is present

2010-12-11 Thread mouss
Le 11/12/2010 17:31, Ansgar Wiechers a écrit : On 2010-12-10 thussvm wrote: Because of a domain move we're doing, we're trying to add a reply-to header in postfix when no reply-to header is already present. The rule we're using is: !/^Reply-To/ prepend Reply-To: "Support" However, since the ch

Re: Adding a reply-to header when none is present

2010-12-11 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2010-12-10 thussvm wrote: > Because of a domain move we're doing, we're trying to add a reply-to > header in postfix when no reply-to header is already present. The rule > we're using is: > > !/^Reply-To/ prepend Reply-To: "Support" > > However, since the check is being applied to each header

Re: Adding a reply-to header when none is present

2010-12-10 Thread mouss
Le 10/12/2010 21:23, thussvm a écrit : Because of a domain move we're doing, we're trying to add a reply-to header in postfix when no reply-to header is already present. The rule we're using is: !/^Reply-To/ prepend Reply-To: "Support" However, since the check is being applied to each header l

Re: Adding a reply-to header when none is present

2010-12-10 Thread Wietse Venema
thussvm: > > Because of a domain move we're doing, we're trying to add a reply-to header > in postfix when no reply-to header is already present. The rule we're using > is: > > !/^Reply-To/ prepend Reply-To: "Support" > > However, since the check is being applied to each header line we get a bu

Adding a reply-to header when none is present

2010-12-10 Thread thussvm
get a bunch of reply-to's prepended instead of just one. Is there a regex we can use to say: If no reply-to header exists anywhere in the headers then prepend one reply-to header Thanks, Todd -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Adding-a-reply-to-header-when-none-is-present