post...@ptld.com:
> On 02-04-2022 4:19 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:16:47PM -0500, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> >
> >> In using address verification it is very clear that any "reject" from
> >> the remote mail server would result in the email triggering the
> >> verificat
On 02-04-2022 4:19 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:16:47PM -0500, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
>> In using address verification it is very clear that any "reject" from
>> the remote mail server would result in the email triggering the
>> verification to be rejected. But i do n
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:16:47PM -0500, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> In using address verification it is very clear that any "reject" from
> the remote mail server would result in the email triggering the
> verification to be rejected. But i do not see anything about 4xx defer
> responses. What if
If i missed this answer on the docs im sorry.
In using address verification it is very clear that any "reject" from the
remote mail server would result in the email triggering the verification to be
rejected. But i do not see anything about 4xx defer responses. What if the
remote server is doin
post...@ptld.com:
> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
>
> "The downside of using a non-empty sender address is that the address
> may end op on spammer mailing lists."
>
> op = up?
This now fixed (in the source code).
Wietse
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
"The downside of using a non-empty sender address is that the address
may end op on spammer mailing lists."
op = up?
