On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:40:32PM -0700, Rob Tanner wrote:
> On 6/25/09 10:16 PM, "Victor Duchovni"
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >
> >>> IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned
> >>> before the queue-id.
> >>
On 6/25/09 10:16 PM, "Victor Duchovni"
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
>>> IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned
>>> before the queue-id.
>>
>> My bad reading of src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c, then. But does that mean an
>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:36:09PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > IIRC, the instance attribute identifies a mail transaction and is assigned
> > before the queue-id.
>
> My bad reading of src/smtpd/smtpd_check.c, then. But does that mean an
> instance can exist *before* the first recipient is ac
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
> >
> > > I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and
> > > returns
> > > an ?OK? and doesn?t otherwise make any deci
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:46:51PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
>
> > I?ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns
> > an ?OK? and doesn?t otherwise make any decisions. What I?m noticing is many
> > of the client requests do
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Rob Tanner wrote:
> I¹ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns
> an ³OK² and doesn¹t otherwise make any decisions. What I¹m noticing is many
> of the client requests do not even contain the instance attribute. My
> assumption from reading th
Hi,
I¹ve got a policy listener in place. It merely logs the request and returns
an ³OK² and doesn¹t otherwise make any decisions. What I¹m noticing is many
of the client requests do not even contain the instance attribute. My
assumption from reading the documentation was that even a single reci
