On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 04:18:49PM +, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
[ Received: from stytwo.spampig.org.uk (stytwo.spampig.org.uk [212.69.52.158]) ]
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:05 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > Everything you need to know is the RELEASE_NOTES.
>
> You are such a rude arse
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:09:24AM -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
> > Everything you need to know is the RELEASE_NOTES.
>
> Read them already... I just wanted to do a double check first.
Good. You should be all set then. By all means go with 2.7.
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking
> There may be several legitimate reasons to stick with an older version
> for some time, but if it's all the same to you, then using the latest
> stable release is always the best default choice.
For products like postfix (in terms of how they manager their product), I have
high confidence when
Postfix 2.7.0 is stable and thus considered production ready. The
2.7-release features some nice improvements over the 2.6-release,
described in the release notes:
http://postfix.rhinotech.nl/postfix-release/official/postfix-2.7.0.RELEASE_NOTES
There may be several legitimate reasons to stick wit
> Everything you need to know is the RELEASE_NOTES.
>
Read them already... I just wanted to do a double check first.
Thanks,
Gary-
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:47:27AM -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
> Our Q2 patch cycle is coming up and I was going to upgrade 2.6.5 -> 2.6.6 on
> the servers but then though maybe 2.6.5 -> 2.7.0 might be in order. I have
> everything ready to go either way (download and created RPM's for both 2.6.6
Our Q2 patch cycle is coming up and I was going to upgrade 2.6.5 -> 2.6.6 on
the servers but then though maybe 2.6.5 -> 2.7.0 might be in order. I have
everything ready to go either way (download and created RPM's for both 2.6.6
and 2.7.0).
Is there any consideration that needs to be made in
