On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 20:06:35 -0400, lance raymond wrote:
> Your right on the error, but the other part of the thread was about
> postfix virtual users, etc which also needed answering.
Please do not top-post. I cannot see any discussion of a Postfix
problem on your system. User management, acce
Your right on the error, but the other part of the thread was about postfix
virtual users, etc which also needed answering.
On Mar 18, 2011 7:39 PM, "Sahil Tandon" wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 16:50:08 -0400, lance raymond wrote:
>
>> What a way to welcome myself to the group! But with that, the
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 16:50:08 -0400, lance raymond wrote:
> What a way to welcome myself to the group! But with that, the mailserver
> crashed (HD fail) and the backups from last night were in tact. Problem is
> the old os was a RH9 (I know) system, built from source, etc. The new box
> is sta
On Mar 18, 2011, at 2:50 PM, lance raymond wrote:
> What a way to welcome myself to the group! But with that, the mailserver
> crashed (HD fail) and the backups from last night were in tact. Problem is
> the old os was a RH9 (I know) system, built from source, etc. The new box is
> staged (
What a way to welcome myself to the group! But with that, the mailserver
crashed (HD fail) and the backups from last night were in tact. Problem is
the old os was a RH9 (I know) system, built from source, etc. The new box
is staged (CentOS5), postfix installed via YUM and the config was then
com
