On Aug 22, 2012, at 15:47, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Google Public DNS seems to look up records again before the TTL
> expires in their cache, so you are indeed likely to see a slight
> improvement in your DNS response time without the doubling of your
> external queries, when using their service. But
[ /dev/rob0 wrote on Wed 22.Aug'12 at 8:47:06 -0500 ]
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:23:12PM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
> > I never realized that I had this issue too. But, after running
> > the tests, I found out that my queries were indeed blocked by
> > spamhaus.
> >
> > So, I changed the servers a
/dev/rob0:
> Google Public DNS seems to look up records again before the TTL
> expires in their cache, so you are indeed likely to see a slight
There is an article that shows that different resolvers report
TTL values in different ways.
Begin quote:
For a record initially served with a TTL eq
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:23:12PM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
> I never realized that I had this issue too. But, after running
> the tests, I found out that my queries were indeed blocked by
> spamhaus.
>
> So, I changed the servers as pointed out and bingo, spam was
> successfully being blocked.
>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:52 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:03:47AM -0500,
>Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> > I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have
> > the configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not
> > to be working.
>
On 8/21/12 11:23 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-08-21 17:02, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez skrev:
Thanks as I was telling I have one, but I think the issue is with the
forwarding it's been made to a public dns server. Should I change it
to a particular one? (ex spamhaus)
no just remove
Den 2012-08-21 17:02, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez skrev:
Thanks as I was telling I have one, but I think the issue is with the
forwarding it's been made to a public dns server. Should I change it
to a particular one? (ex spamhaus)
no just remove ALL forwarding !
Den 2012-08-21 16:53, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez skrev:
[root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
Host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[root@mail ~]#
dig +trace 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
where does it fail ?
then contact the nameservers that rej
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:06:34AM -0500, I wrote:
> That was my guess. Now it seems to be confirmed. Remove the
> forwarders from named.conf(5), ensure that recursion is allowed at
> least for "localhost"[1], "rndc reload", test again. If the test
> fails again, you might have to flush the cach
On 8/21/12 10:06 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:45:50AM -0500,
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
Thanks for the tip but I have bind running and it seems not to be
allowed to make queries to spamhaus:
[root@mail ~]# dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org any
;<<>> DiG 9.8.2rc
Zitat von Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
[root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
Host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org not found: 3
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:45:50AM -0500,
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> Thanks for the tip but I have bind running and it seems not to be
> allowed to make queries to spamhaus:
>
> [root@mail ~]# dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org any
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.
On 8/21/2012 11:02 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
>
> On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
>>
>>> Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
>>>
>>> [root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
>>> Host 107.178.2
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
> Thanks as I was telling I have one, but I think the issue is with the
> forwarding
Yes. Why are you forwarding at all? Simply let you DNS recurse & cache.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
[root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
Host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[root@mail ~]#
Use a proper DNS se
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
> Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
>
> [root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
> Host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> [root@mail ~]#
Use a proper DNS server (like somebody on this thread al
On 8/21/12 9:46 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
The IP that's testing my mail server is 192.203.178.107, I used the
spamhaus lookup tool to confirm that the IP was listed.
192.203.178.107 is indeed listed.
$ host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
107.178.203.192
On 8/21/12 9:25 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/21/2012 10:03 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
working.
I'm testing with htt
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
> The IP that's testing my mail server is 192.203.178.107, I used the
> spamhaus lookup tool to confirm that the IP was listed.
192.203.178.107 is indeed listed.
$ host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
t
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:03:47AM -0500, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes
Jiménez wrote:
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have
the configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not
to be working.
I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
addr
On 8/21/12 9:20 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
Hi everyone.
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
working.
Logs?
I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spam
On 8/21/2012 10:03 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
> configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
> working.
>
> I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:03:47AM -0500,
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have
> the configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not
> to be working.
>
> I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
> configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
> working.
Logs?
> I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
> address listed
Hi everyone.
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be working.
I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
address listed but I'm still getting those emails.
Here's the postc
25 matches
Mail list logo
