RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Engin qwert
nting to server) > Mail Server > The mail sent. but ; Mail Server (Icedove program pointing to itself) > Cannot send mail (the error message were "no route to the host") Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:13:55 +0100 From: p...@netpresto.co.uk To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: 回

Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Stefan Caunter
- > Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100 > From: p...@netpresto.co.uk <mailto:p...@netpresto.co.uk> > To: postfix-users@postfix.org <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org> > Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host > > What is the output from the command > > traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 >

Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Paul Enlund
- > Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100 > From: p...@netpresto.co.uk <mailto:p...@netpresto.co.uk> > To: postfix-users@postfix.org <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org> > Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host > > What is the output from the command > > traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2 >

RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Engin qwert
@postfix.org Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host And now traceroute -T -p 80 168.100.189.2 and traceroute -T -p 587 168.100.189.2 On 29/07/2012 23:57, Engin qwert wrote: root@xn

Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Paul Enlund
138.9.254) 39.993 ms !X * * > > > > Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100 > From: p...@netpresto.co.uk > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host > > What is the output from

RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Engin qwert
Name: hotmail.com Address: 65.55.72.151 > Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800 > Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host > From: little...@tcssh.tc.edu.tw > To: postf ix-us...@postfix.org; mjw

Re: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Paul Enlund
Address: 65.55.72.167 > Name:hotmail.com > Address: 65.55.72.183 > Name:hotmail.com > Address: 65.55.72.135 > Name:hotmail.com > Address: 65.55.72.151 > > > > Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800 > > Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host > > From: little...@tcssh.tc.edu.tw

RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Engin qwert
I commented the line you told. It did'nt changed the result. > Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:29:54 +0800 > Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host > From: little...@tcssh.tc.edu.tw > To: postfix-users@postfix.org; mjw...@kapu.net > > Just comment the transport field and reload

RE: 回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Engin qwert
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800 > Subject: 回覆: Re: no route to host > From: little...@tcssh.tc.edu.tw > To: postfix-users@postfix.org; mjw...@kapu.net > > Hi there, > >Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the &

回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Littlecho
Just comment the transport field and reload your postfix before you are going to re-do the test! LittleCho@My Xperia Michael J Wise 提到: > >On Jul 29, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Engin qwert wrote: > >> transport_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf > >… any from other logs, yer My

回覆: Re: no route to host

2012-07-29 Thread Pin-Ren Chiou
Hi there, Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the mail handlers and then use "telnet" to test one of the mail handlers at port 25? I think it os necessary to check whether the problem is happening as a mail routing issue or a host routing issue. Also,please c